MSI to unveil 10th Anniversary RTX 2080 Ti Lightning Edition
Ballistix Elite 3600 MHz 16GB Dual Channel DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Cooler Master SK621 Compact keyboard review
Star Wars Battlefront II PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 11/15/2017 02:38 PM [
56 comment(s) ]
It's time to check out that PC release of Star Wars: Battlefront II (2017) for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
Star Wars: Battlefront II (2017)benchmarks
pages 1 2 3
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Posted on: 11/15/2017 02:56 PM
Each 4th hardware change triggers the DRM protection. I would assume under the same IP you can run it with 3 PCs.
What's the max number of computers on one Origin game?
Each 4th hardware change triggers the DRM protection. I would assume under the same IP you can run it with 3 PCs.
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 241
Senior Member
Posts: 241
Posted on: 11/15/2017 03:21 PM
Hilbert, will you make a DX11-DX12 comparison? It would be nice to see it. As I checked the 2 German benchmarks, it seems like AMD holds their fps when switching to DX12 while NV loses some.
Hilbert, will you make a DX11-DX12 comparison? It would be nice to see it. As I checked the 2 German benchmarks, it seems like AMD holds their fps when switching to DX12 while NV loses some.
vbetts
Posts: 14361
Posts: 14361
Posted on: 11/15/2017 03:22 PM
I'm glad I have hardware that gets me more than zero fps! :p Talk about unplayable!
Joking aside, seems like it scales pretty well. CPU wise I'm really curious, just built my brother an FX machine and want to see how it scales on that.
I'm glad I have hardware that gets me more than zero fps! :p Talk about unplayable!
Joking aside, seems like it scales pretty well. CPU wise I'm really curious, just built my brother an FX machine and want to see how it scales on that.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Posted on: 11/15/2017 03:24 PM
Yes, but at this stage I want to wait until AMD and NV have updated their driver -- and whenever I can access the game again. lol.
Hilbert, will you make a DX11-DX12 comparison? It would be nice to see it. As I checked the 2 German benchmarks, it seems like AMD holds their fps when switching to DX12 while NV loses some.
Yes, but at this stage I want to wait until AMD and NV have updated their driver -- and whenever I can access the game again. lol.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Posted on: 11/15/2017 04:01 PM
Lol, fixed !
Lol, fixed !
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16127
Senior Member
Posts: 16127
Posted on: 11/15/2017 05:52 PM
look at Vega64 @ 1080p go..
Guess higher resolutions cripple those 64ROPs
look at Vega64 @ 1080p go..
Guess higher resolutions cripple those 64ROPs
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3876
Senior Member
Posts: 3876
Posted on: 11/15/2017 06:29 PM
A bit weird seeing the Vega64 performing so well in low resolutions. Also weird that it wasn't scaling as great in high resolutions. Isn't it usually the opposite?
I'm glad I have hardware that gets me more than zero fps! :p Talk about unplayable!
Joking aside, seems like it scales pretty well. CPU wise I'm really curious, just built my brother an FX machine and want to see how it scales on that.
An overclocked FX CPU is usually just fine for 1080p@60FPS gaming, and should handle 2K just fine. You're probably going to get bottlnecked if you go any higher than that.
A bit weird seeing the Vega64 performing so well in low resolutions. Also weird that it wasn't scaling as great in high resolutions. Isn't it usually the opposite?
I'm glad I have hardware that gets me more than zero fps! :p Talk about unplayable!
Joking aside, seems like it scales pretty well. CPU wise I'm really curious, just built my brother an FX machine and want to see how it scales on that.
An overclocked FX CPU is usually just fine for 1080p@60FPS gaming, and should handle 2K just fine. You're probably going to get bottlnecked if you go any higher than that.
Only Intruder
Senior Member
Posts: 1005
Senior Member
Posts: 1005
Posted on: 11/15/2017 07:19 PM
A bit weird seeing the Vega64 performing so well in low resolutions. Also weird that it wasn't scaling as great in high resolutions. Isn't it usually the opposite?
An overclocked FX CPU is usually just fine for 1080p@60FPS gaming, and should handle 2K just fine. You're probably going to get bottlnecked if you go any higher than that.
It's because of unoptimised drivers from nVidia showing CPU overhead, we've been seeing this fairly often with Vega now, Vega seems to be quite reliable in terms of performance - I believe it's by design AMD wishing to create a persistent performing card with reduced driver/CPU overhead hence why the higher resolutions show more typical results - nVidia optimised drivers when they're released will see normality resume.
A bit weird seeing the Vega64 performing so well in low resolutions. Also weird that it wasn't scaling as great in high resolutions. Isn't it usually the opposite?
An overclocked FX CPU is usually just fine for 1080p@60FPS gaming, and should handle 2K just fine. You're probably going to get bottlnecked if you go any higher than that.
It's because of unoptimised drivers from nVidia showing CPU overhead, we've been seeing this fairly often with Vega now, Vega seems to be quite reliable in terms of performance - I believe it's by design AMD wishing to create a persistent performing card with reduced driver/CPU overhead hence why the higher resolutions show more typical results - nVidia optimised drivers when they're released will see normality resume.
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 837
Senior Member
Posts: 837
Posted on: 11/15/2017 07:45 PM
Another game even the press can't benchmark because of stupid DRM.
Will not buy.
Thanks for the hard work HH!
Another game even the press can't benchmark because of stupid DRM.
Will not buy.
Thanks for the hard work HH!
Yxskaft
Senior Member
Posts: 1259
Senior Member
Posts: 1259
Posted on: 11/15/2017 08:12 PM
If you're talking about PCgameshardware, they say that enabling DX12 automatically enables dynamic resolution. It seems like they didn't notice that before publishing their results.
They point out that DX11 still is superior once disabling the dynamic resolution, but that DX12 is alot better than it was during the Beta
Hilbert, will you make a DX11-DX12 comparison? It would be nice to see it. As I checked the 2 German benchmarks, it seems like AMD holds their fps when switching to DX12 while NV loses some.
If you're talking about PCgameshardware, they say that enabling DX12 automatically enables dynamic resolution. It seems like they didn't notice that before publishing their results.
They point out that DX11 still is superior once disabling the dynamic resolution, but that DX12 is alot better than it was during the Beta
r3claim3r
Senior Member
Posts: 3959
Senior Member
Posts: 3959
Posted on: 11/16/2017 04:03 AM
With EA games having their heads up their hind quarters with their DRM, I think I'll pass on this title. At least for now.
With EA games having their heads up their hind quarters with their DRM, I think I'll pass on this title. At least for now.
Thunk_It
Senior Member
Posts: 138
Senior Member
Posts: 138
Posted on: 11/16/2017 04:20 AM
Many thanks for doing this review. The DRM limitation however, is definitely not helpful.
Many thanks for doing this review. The DRM limitation however, is definitely not helpful.
Mufflore
Senior Member
Posts: 11071
Senior Member
Posts: 11071
Posted on: 11/16/2017 05:31 AM
Sounds like a sad yawn title.
I'll look out for more user opinions but this appears to be pushing PC games in a bad direction.
One I wont follow.
Sounds like a sad yawn title.
I'll look out for more user opinions but this appears to be pushing PC games in a bad direction.
One I wont follow.
S V S
Member
Posts: 31
Member
Posts: 31
Posted on: 11/16/2017 08:04 AM
Sounds like a sad yawn title.
I'll look out for more user opinions but this appears to be pushing PC games in a bad direction.
One I wont follow.
Agreed. It wouldn't take much to convince me to buy a decent Star Wars game with some token starfighter battles (memories of Tie Fighter and X-Wing on PC are strong).. but I am done playing any games using loot crates. They aren't fun for me. I don't think they are fun for anyone.
Simple exploitation, taking advantage of well-known human psychology. No different than gambling, but without any government regulation (and no "real" benefit to "winning").
Sounds like a sad yawn title.
I'll look out for more user opinions but this appears to be pushing PC games in a bad direction.
One I wont follow.
Agreed. It wouldn't take much to convince me to buy a decent Star Wars game with some token starfighter battles (memories of Tie Fighter and X-Wing on PC are strong).. but I am done playing any games using loot crates. They aren't fun for me. I don't think they are fun for anyone.
Simple exploitation, taking advantage of well-known human psychology. No different than gambling, but without any government regulation (and no "real" benefit to "winning").
Carlos
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Posted on: 11/16/2017 08:05 AM
Hi Hilbert! Can you please ad intel 7700k to the cpu scaling performance analysis.
Hi Hilbert! Can you please ad intel 7700k to the cpu scaling performance analysis.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Posted on: 11/16/2017 09:33 AM
No, but 8700k and Ryzen 7 1800 will be added.
Hi Hilbert! Can you please ad intel 7700k to the cpu scaling performance analysis.
No, but 8700k and Ryzen 7 1800 will be added.
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13439
Senior Member
Posts: 13439
Posted on: 11/16/2017 09:36 AM
The feeling when NVIDIA releases new drivers the next day. xD
The feeling when NVIDIA releases new drivers the next day. xD
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Posted on: 11/16/2017 11:59 AM
Addendum 16-11-17:
Added more graphics cards
Added DirectX 11 vs DirectX 12 performance comparison
Tested 388.13 versus 388.31 drivers do not optimize GeForce performance, they merely add SLI compatibility. Ergo the results for GeForce graphics cards stand as they are.
Addendum 16-11-17:
Added more graphics cards
Added DirectX 11 vs DirectX 12 performance comparison
Tested 388.13 versus 388.31 drivers do not optimize GeForce performance, they merely add SLI compatibility. Ergo the results for GeForce graphics cards stand as they are.
Mysteryboi
Senior Member
Posts: 121
Senior Member
Posts: 121
Posted on: 11/16/2017 01:09 PM
Came for the comments wasn't disappointed even the conclusion summed it up nicely good job hilbert
Boycott EA / Activision rubbish greedy companies that ruin game franchises / developer studios
Came for the comments wasn't disappointed even the conclusion summed it up nicely good job hilbert
Boycott EA / Activision rubbish greedy companies that ruin game franchises / developer studios
kroks
Member
Posts: 63
Member
Posts: 63
Posted on: 11/16/2017 02:14 PM
haha drm
stop buying ea games!!!
haha drm
stop buying ea games!!!
Vipu2
Senior Member
Posts: 545
Senior Member
Posts: 545
Posted on: 11/16/2017 03:55 PM
Another game even the press can't benchmark because of stupid DRM.
Will not buy.
Thanks for the hard work HH!
I think the DRM is smallest problem this game have.
Another game even the press can't benchmark because of stupid DRM.
Will not buy.
Thanks for the hard work HH!
I think the DRM is smallest problem this game have.
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Posted on: 11/16/2017 05:06 PM
Why Nvidia can not get the same performance with dx12 but even lesser performance, and with other DX12 games Nvidia get the seme or better performance. It smells fishy
Why Nvidia can not get the same performance with dx12 but even lesser performance, and with other DX12 games Nvidia get the seme or better performance. It smells fishy
Nima V
Member
Posts: 53
Member
Posts: 53
Posted on: 11/16/2017 06:34 PM
Another game that performs better with DirectX 11. I wonder why some developers still insist on wasting time and money for implementing low level APIs despite all the problems they bring to PC games.
Another game that performs better with DirectX 11. I wonder why some developers still insist on wasting time and money for implementing low level APIs despite all the problems they bring to PC games.
Maddness
Senior Member
Posts: 884
Senior Member
Posts: 884
Posted on: 11/16/2017 08:01 PM
Fury-X still performs pretty well in this game, even at higher resolutions.
Fury-X still performs pretty well in this game, even at higher resolutions.
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 612
What's the max number of computers on one Origin game?