Watch Dogs VGA graphics performance benchmark review

Game reviews 126 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Watch Dogs VGA graphics performance benchmark review on our message forum
#4825487
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
Except without crossfire you won't even be getting over 40FPS.
except if you lower some in-game options. you know 'in-game graphics /video options'? but keep the ultra textures of course. the hell needs blur and aa anyways? 😀
#4825489
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
you like the game, HH? have you even had time to play?
Yeah definitely, I have played it a bit since Saturday already.
#4825490
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/149/149159.jpg
Let me make this 100% clear, we only use legit software period. I received a Ubisoft media key that is unlocked.
The problem is all the other people on here playing and even saying its pirated.
#4825493
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/229/229509.jpg
The problem is all the other people on here playing and even saying its pirated.
The pirated version has a bitcoin miner in... Thanks for the review, boss.
#4825495
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
Well, guess I'll have to play this on medium-high, just as I did with Wolfenstein... can't wait to get my hands on a new GPU with ****loads of vram, but I won't wait on playing the game until that, as painful as it is. 🤓
#4825537
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/240/240526.jpg
Well,I guess I have to wait for Maxwell,GTX 880, to play all Ultra on a single card.Thx for the review Hilbert!
Yeah, kind of ridiculous a 700$ GPU can't run this game extremely well maxed out.
#4825542
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
Check the last page of the review already would you ...
wth is that on the last page and not on dx 11 class graphics card performance pages did the cards suddenly not become DX11? when even name that page that if your not gona put the information about its performance there. Call that section what it is which is tests for 2k+ res
#4825554
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/228/228458.jpg
The problem is all the other people on here playing and even saying its pirated.
Not everyone is playing the pirated version. Some of us got our retail copy early.
#4825572
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
@HH, perhaps an additional system ram section, 4gb vs 8gb vs 16gb and also page file usage. (do it with titan so no vram bottleneck) and with a titan just how much vram does it use at different resolutions /graphics settings.
#4825575
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/99/99142.jpg
Not everyone is playing the pirated version. Some of us got our retail copy early.
A few are though. I did download it but also bought it from G2A. I won't play it until I get my key from G2A and install the 14.6 driver. I think there should be more clarity on the forum about how far we can discuss an unreleased game.
#4825600
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
wth is that on the last page and not on dx 11 class graphics card performance pages did the cards suddenly not become DX11? when even name that page that if your not gona put the information about its performance there. Call that section what it is which is tests for 2k+ res
if you read the article entierly, including the intro, you will understand why.. actually performance are a bit troublesome, hence why the article is a bit "strange" if you only jump to the graph.. Once the 14.6 driver is out and the game maybe patched ( day zero patch ? ). i can imagine the review will be updated.
#4825602
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/228/228574.jpg
I played the naughty version to see how the game ran/played/looked. If they released demos I wouldn't touch that **** but these days I'm in no mood to spend 40+ quid on a game that could be a turd. Luckily the games really good and is packed full of content so I'm just pre loading the real one on steam as we speak.
#4825606
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
meh.
#4825619
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
if you read the article entierly, including the intro, you will understand why.. actually performance are a bit troublesome, hence why the article is a bit "strange" if you only jump to the graph.. Once the 14.6 driver is out and the game maybe patched ( day zero patch ? ). i can imagine the review will be updated.
that is what most people want to see, and when i see DX11 graphics class performance i think stats for the cards, NOT stats for 2k+ res on specific cards
#4825625
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
nvidia = skimpy on vram since forever. soon 4gb isn't gonna cut it after the concoles find their feet at least with txaa and the like, gtx 880 supposedly 4gb so take it from there that 4gb ain't gonna cut it and will be the bottleneck like always at least with a game or two (usually a nice one) at some point ..witcher3? lol. the gtx 880 will have 8gb versions probably if stock is 4gb. just some ramblings,
#4825647
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
I am very unimpressed by the visuals. Ubisoft lied out of there asses. F**k em.
#4825690
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/54/54823.jpg
This review image is bindblowing 🙂. Car shading looks even better, than gran turismo 3 @ps2
Pffttt, my PS2 emulator with 16x AA and 16AF @ 4K will blow your mind
#4825692
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
wth is that on the last page and not on dx 11 class graphics card performance pages did the cards suddenly not become DX11? when even name that page that if your not gona put the information about its performance there. Call that section what it is which is tests for 2k+ res
Having a bad day or something ?
#4825697
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230424.jpg
Thanks for this Hilbert, nice wright up.

Previous Page

Next Page