Watch Dogs VGA graphics performance benchmark review
Click here to post a comment for Watch Dogs VGA graphics performance benchmark review on our message forum
antonyfrn
Call of Duty Ghosts VGA graphics card performance benchmarks?
soz couldn't resist
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Aaargh, I used a article design template from an older article for this one. Fixed 😉
gerardfraser
Too bad the game has some problems.I think I will wait a few days to buy this one.Thanks for the preliminary review,it helped me out with my decision.
SeruX
7870 1155/1387 is pushing this game very well
Texture on High everything else on ultra 1080p 40~60fps
Btw i just download early for tests purpose, already buy 2 key for this game.
-Tj-
Thanks,
btw did you check what's up with pagefile? few confirmed it ran alot better with it off, otherwise it cached to much in pagefile instead of system ram.
Rich_Guy
Ubiport strike again 😀
EDIT: Its fixed :P
meth curd
interested to see framerates with the optimized drivers
pbvider
Well,I guess I have to wait for Maxwell,GTX 880, to play all Ultra on a single card.Thx for the review Hilbert!
dk_lightning
So delete my post and not his after pointing out an error? Nice.
...
I am also getting a boat load of stuttering if I have the settings to high. Getting 1700mb+ of used VRAM.
Most any game I have ever played has used.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
It is called thread cleaning, the COD error was reported and fixed. You however noticed it as the cache had not yet updated it.
dk_lightning
Fair enough,
But a PM would be nice. I have no problem at all with posts being deleted but a PM to the user in question with a reason would be polite vs nothing and the user left wondering what had happened or what they done.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
I have not run into that one at all .. then again the test setup has 16GB RAM so I doubt it would write IO to swap anyway.
But hey, could be very plausible .. as mentioned in the article, I think there will be quite a few patches with this game in the near future.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Revert to FXAA and set texture quality to high.
Rich_Guy
Be interesting to see the updated AMD results, once their Watchdogs optimized driver is used. :P
Carfax
Were the GTX 770 and 680 results switched around by accident?
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=10532
Goutan
On page 5 it says that you are using a driver: 338.88 - not sure if this is an error or not, but is this an upcoming driver we can be expecting?
INSTG8R
That's what I am waiting for. I got my key last night so I played a little at 3am and some more today and fiddling around with settings trying to find a nice balance. It is using a whopping 2800MB of VRAM with Textures on Ultra! I had to settle on FXAA to get anything above 30FPS
F1refly
Ah and the 60fps dream lives on. Master race my.....
Ryu5uzaku
yeah at 2560x1440 780 ti 39 fps and amd got 290x got 40. at uhd 22 fps for ti and 38 for amd. Those amd cards are somehow really under utilized in this title. 290x should by going the res increase push easily 60fps over at 1080p 😀
peshkohacka
....
