Unigine Superposition performance benchmarks
Click here to post a comment for Unigine Superposition performance benchmarks on our message forum
bigfutus
Its over 9000!
http://i.imgur.com/RvzA8D1.jpg
Angrycrab
http://i.imgur.com/22RQLSM.png
kendoka15
The VR test isn't locked to the paid version (the article says it is)
Eremiel
It seems that it doesn't support SLI properly. during the test one of my GTX690 GPU's works %100 while the second GPU works under %20 all the time!
-Tj-
....
mbze430
SLI Titan Xp that isn't using the 2nd GPU
http://tinypic.com/r/14ech7p/9
No1True
Gives me error:
procedure entry point AddDllDirectory could not be located... kernel32.dll
:(
mbze430
yeah, with the SLI "hack", it finally benchmark with both cards!
http://i64.tinypic.com/2yzbkwn.png
8k --- When is the Titan Volta coming? Looks like I need Volta SLI Titan to get 100fps+
http://i65.tinypic.com/kb90k1.png
vince2201
GTX 980 TI G1 Gaming , running in 1080p Extreme : 4359 points
GPU @ 1530 Mhz (the card runs at 1380 Mhz stock in game mode)
RAM@ 4001 Mhz (3501 Mhz stock)
I7 4790K @4.5 Ghz for 1.19 volt ; 2*8 GB of G.Skill Trident X 2400 Mhz CAS 10 @ 1.59 volt
https://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=2400902854184.jpg
https://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=2400902854184.jpg
AQUILES
http://img.fenixzone.net/i/H6OTRnu.png
Now I'll try the new version.
You only need to change the profile of SLI compatibility bits DX10 + DX11 to 0x080116F5 for Unigine: Superposition with the Nvidia Inspector to take advantage of the 2 cards.
This is what I got out with the previous version of the program.
AQUILES
With the latest drivers to date and different CPU gives me identical result:
http://img.fenixzone.net/i/7ctiDqF.png
BuildeR2
Thaaaaaaat doesn't seem right. Lower min and max ends up with identical score? Also, going from i5 to i7 changes score 0?
AQUILES
BuildeR2
@AQUILES I guess so, but I would think that with 4 digits in the score it would have at least dropped to 5132. :/
jbscotchman
http://i67.tinypic.com/23lnviu.jpg
AQUILES
http://img.fenixzone.net/i/x3RhYMS.png
http://img.fenixzone.net/i/rDpmFSY.png
http://img.fenixzone.net/i/v25Lrtn.png
I think the result didn't change because the average fps were identical.
I also tested the other qualities:
HARDRESET
https://scontent.fhou1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/56966822_10217131806100585_1008892452100112384_o.jpg?_nc_cat=105&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-2.fna&oh=197ac165fe3c067674e48fcc58c599ac&oe=5D4AFCC7
AQUILES
https://i.ibb.co/pxpZFXJ/Superposition-Benchmark-v1-0-5119-1518467183.png
Score almost the same as what I got with an i5 4690 and now with an i7 4790.
What's your point?
In this bench it doesn't matter almost the CPU so it's irrelevant to look at that section.
For example, this is what I got with a modest G3258: