Unigine Superposition performance benchmarks

Game reviews 126 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Unigine Superposition performance benchmarks on our message forum
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
Hilbert want to delete my thread for housekeeping.? And this reply as well?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/229/229798.jpg
Thank you HH. DX11 only? Does it have DX12 test?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Hilbert want to delete my thread for housekeeping.? And this reply as well?
Yeah you where so fast to report though so I didn't want to insult you by deleting it. If you are ok with it then I will remove it to keep things tidy, thanks man.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Thank you HH. DX11 only? Does it have DX12 test?
Nope, no D3D12 and no Vulkan either.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/229/229798.jpg
Nope, no D3D12 and no Vulkan either.
Sorry I asked before reading the article. Yes it is disappointing. Thanks again. PS: It would help much Hilbert if you note the boost clock of each card in the results section. So that we can make some rough assumptions about individual factory overclocked cards. Like I see in your results the gtx 1080, but my 1080 xtreme boosts normally to 2036.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Sorry I asked before reading the article. Yes it is disappointing. Thanks again. PS: It would help much Hilbert if you note the boost clock of each card in the results section. So that we can make some rough assumptions about individual factory overclocked cards. Like I see in your results the gtx 1080, but my 1080 xtreme boosts normally to 2036.
All cards in the benchmarks are always reference with the corresponding boost modes (unless noted otherwise). The video however was a last minute thing I did on an AIB card.
data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp
My two cents: 1080 med: 14094 1080 extreme: 3839 8K: 2738 Looks quite ok on med and performance is good. But extreme is only slightly better and performance is much worse. All in all not bad, but compared to unreal, frostbyte and co nothing that special (nice lighting thouh)
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
Well, this benchmark was touted as being photo-realistic on their website, I'd say it's a long way from photo-realistic! Here are the results on my rig (online comparison feature not working yet, praps not enough results collected yet): 1080p Extreme: 3858 1080p High: 10039 Surprised I beat (or equalled) Bogeyx's 2100Mhz GTX 1070 above - mind you I described my GTX 1070 as 2062Mhz in my sig, but really it stabalises at 2012-2025Mhz in that benchmark with auto fan settings.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/255/255510.jpg
Boy Oh Boy does this app demon straight the diminishing returns in game eye candy. Actual artwork is never gonna give us what we want and neither is infinity triangles.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250418.jpg
I could only do 1080p Medium because of VDRAM limitations. 4515 Score FPS: min 27.38, avg 33.78, max 42.61 GPU was always at 100% and CPU barely hit 40%. I really need to upgrade ahahah. On another note, it's really disappointing not having DX12 or Vulcan: it's a missed opportunity.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260048.jpg
4k optimized - 9818
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
Surprised I beat (or equalled) Bogeyx's 2100Mhz GTX 1070 above - mind you I described my GTX 1070 as 2062Mhz in my sig, but really it stabalises at 2012-2025Mhz in that benchmark with auto fan settings.
Edit: Just made a second run: 3932. I think i mispelled it. It probably was 3939 instead of 3839:bang:
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
Well all I can provide is a HD 7770 results if anyone is interested...since my RX 480 was just received for RMA today. /edit incidentally I do not have ego that needs to be stroked you need to sleep too.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/269/269310.jpg
1080p: med: 7780 high: 5560 xtr: 2381
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/183/183421.jpg
NO D3D12 NO Vulcan so tell me again why they put this disappointment out other than to try and make money by opening up Vulcan if buy it I personally think it should have been the other way round start out with d3d12 and vulcan want OpenGL and d3d11 for a small fee you can open those avenues too Edit: So downloaded it went to run the program and DirectX bench fails with an Couldn't create 1920x1080 window https://3yjwcq.dm2301.livefilestore.com/y4m48S_9hBh8qn40oN7QKRsdGe_kbGd5UBx1webPEEaxm1qBZTk1DvtFu6VPAN0_lNYeyo_xxTNVRSqxYw_91LymZrVOvruh22aL38F6quSx2DvOnP2CbokA8SkKuCXx5F0o4xAY1lC6Na3--Gchz06Sv55KrffZajxiRmjo8ZuX88Hsb_4DeLX3ayltmEhiigeR9Z_4kZq65hZp1rGPSCZcQ?width=399&height=196&cropmode=none although OpenGL worked perfectly fine
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/85/85047.jpg
Does CPU OC affect results score bench?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224067.jpg
Does CPU OC affect results score bench?
Probably not with this bench, CPU sat at 13% or something the whole run for me, it's a GPU bench, same as Heaven and Valley