Crytek Not Doing Well Might File bankruptcy

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Crytek Not Doing Well Might File bankruptcy on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/68/68055.jpg
I don't care what other say, but i enjoyed Crysis 1 and Warhead, well until aliens, just like Far Cry until mutants 🙂 2 and 3 are meh for me, not terrible, but i don't care about them.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/211/211933.jpg
Who? The crytek that doesn't care about PC anymore? Don't care about them.
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
To each and their own, it was released next to UT3 and COD4, COD4 is light years above any crysis game at all parameters besides graphic and might be sound.
I would say it was the other way around . Although COD 4 had a great story, It was entirely linear and lacked the replay value. On the other hand CRYSIS has great replay value. It was not just about doing missions going point A to Point B following orders. It required the gamer to be smart, think and improvise on every mission .
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
Businessmen and heads of Crytek shouldn't be so greedy, greed always lead to bankrupt. Of course there are other circumstances, but greed is usually the one which kills.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
Blame Mike Read. He's a man who fluked his way into the games industry and is akin to a Hollywood studio executive who was born with sunglasses on. He failed upwards, some people do; now he's bought down an entire company due to mismanagement. No doubt he'll survive somehow, even though he has no discernible talent.
He must have fluked it alright, as i remember him doing Saturday Superstore 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246564.jpg
Good riddance. They haven't done anything worthy of note since the original Crysis, which, admittedly, was an amazing game (for a FPS) that I still occasionally revisit nearly 7 years later.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
I don't care what happens so long as EA doesn't somehow benefit from this. Personally I agree with Moab, their games sucked. I didn't even enjoy Crysis 1, the moment I found the plot had finally become interesting the game ended.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246564.jpg
I don't care what happens so long as EA doesn't somehow benefit from this. Personally I agree with Moab, their games sucked. I didn't even enjoy Crysis 1, the moment I found the plot had finally become interesting the game ended.
Ahahaha, you know, now that you mention it, you're right. I remember when I first got to that point I was like "alright! let's go!! come on!" and then it ended leaving me staring at the screen in bewilderment and disappointment.
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
It's a shame all the same. The original crysis I did like. I completed that one. I'm yet to complete crysis 3 - I'll get round to it at some point. But, tbh, as people here say - its been a bit "meh" since the original crysis. I do like the engine though, sometimes... Buuut lets face it, UE4 or Cryengine? I know which I'd prefer...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230424.jpg
In Cryteks defence, id like to remind anyone who may or may not remember... atleasts Crytek didnt make a level/mission as terrible as Bungie's 'The Library' in Halo 1. I stopped playing the HD remake due to that level being an hour and half (not even at the end of it) of zigzagging the EXACT same hallway layout with respawning flood. offtopic i know... but just food for thought. Nothing of what Crytek have or havent done is as terrible as that Halo mission. Edit: seriously, Value patched up Ep 2 or 3 due to a mission, but the Library mission needs to be removed from Halo in the upcoming remake. Its that bad.
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
Yeah whatever, the rts genre hasn't been completely neglected, all the rpgs have been a big let down and everyone wants to make the next whiz bang fps. Who cares what happens to them, fps developers are just another drop in the ocean these days.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/239/239932.jpg
The low gravity mission in Crysis 1 was terrible.
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
You guys all fail to notice or even mention their lack of support for indie developers. They released an SDK which was fantastic and offered a lot to work with, especially visually it was just amazing. But they dealt poorly with all the indie developers, not giving them any support for the engine or development process at all. You could develop a nice tech demo on their SDK, or a mod of crysis, but if you really want to run your own code you are out of luck. They will not release source code or give you any other support unless you are a AAA developer. Go look at a list of released Cryengine games that came from their SDK. What, you can't find any?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
The low gravity mission in Crysis 1 was terrible.
You mean that alien ship mission when you leave and everything is white not green anymore? 😀 Ah, i hated it too.
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
What a bunch of biatches there is on here, I think crytek should get some credit for pushing other studios to improve visual fidelity within games. I've never thought anything they did surpassed farcry at the time but hey still hats of to em. As for moving over to the console market, I would have 4 hardware configs instead of hundreds if not thousands in the PC arena. Jesus you guys make me wanna deny owning a ****ing gaming PC full stop.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256367.jpg
What a bunch of biatches there is on here, I think crytek should get some credit for pushing other studios to improve visual fidelity within games. I've never thought anything they did surpassed farcry at the time but hey still hats of to em. As for moving over to the console market, I would have 4 hardware configs instead of hundreds if not thousands in the PC arena. Jesus you guys make me wanna deny owning a ****ing gaming PC full stop.
Crytek are my fav Devs and Cevat is ultra uber extra cool in my eyes, the hell cares what folks think anyways? Crytek is pc gaming. crysis 3 is a masterpiece, let the haters hate, the hell cares anyways, just ignore em'. 🙂
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
offtopic i know... but just food for thought. Nothing of what Crytek have or havent done is as terrible as that Halo mission.
*Points at door* GET OUT! (serious - ) @ release (remembering the release date) - it wasn't that bad.
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
The company does amazing technologies and demos but it has missed two very important things: 1. Gamers buy content over amazing technologies 2. Developers buy speed over amazing technologies Their games have been low on content (and simply put: bad) and their development tools have been very unreliable and buggy. And here we are. They are basically consentrating on wrong things. Amazing technologies can be an asset, but not without all other stuff done well.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
Well i guess in end, Crytek is another victim of EA´s widow´s kiss. EA has already trashed/destroyed Command and Conquer, Sim City, Syndicate, Dead Space, among others and now Crysis (Crytek) and Battlefield is going the same way. There´s no stopping the path of destruction of great games for EA. It must be some company mission... No wonder eveybody hates EA!!!