Comparative Analysis of Intel 300 and Core i3-14100

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Comparative Analysis of Intel 300 and Core i3-14100 on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270792.jpg
The regular Joe doesn't need more than that.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
fredgml7:

The regular Joe doesn't need more than that.
Doesn't need more than which, the 300 or the 14100? Because for the latter, I agree - that's enough for everyday basic tasks. The 300, on the other hand, seems like a rather stupid product: If it's meant to be cheap, you'd be better off buying something used from a couple years ago. If it's meant to be power efficient, it'd have been better off being a quad E-core chip. If it was meant to be power efficient but with a full set of instructions, then include 1 P core and a pair of E cores. But frankly, the fact Intel is still making dual core chips in 2024 doesn't speak well of how refined their process is.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270792.jpg
schmidtbag:

Doesn't need more than which, the 300 or the 14100? Because for the latter, I agree - that's enough for everyday basic tasks. The 300, on the other hand, seems like a rather stupid product: If it's meant to be cheap, you'd be better off buying something used from a couple years ago. If it's meant to be power efficient, it'd have been better off being a quad E-core chip. If it was meant to be power efficient but with a full set of instructions, then include 1 P core and a pair of E cores. But frankly, the fact Intel is still making dual core chips in 2024 doesn't speak well of how refined their process is.
I was talking about the 300. But only performance wise. 😀