Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review
Click here to post a comment for Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review on our message forum
StewieTech
That vram usage is *woah*. Does it really use such tremendous textures or did someone screw up the port? 5gb at 1080p, i mean, fack.:3eyes:
CalculuS
Deckard
signex
Impressive performance, been waiting for vga benchmark of this game!
Memorian
The game just uses as much Vram as it can see, just like all the latest games.It's fully playable with 2GB cards at max settings.
proFits
Raider0001
I cant play this game now, doesn't support 21:9 ratio so everything is stretched :lmaa:
Bassarnis
Almost 5.5gbs of vram on a titan @1080p /sigh. It used 4059mb on my 770s. I can also confirm the random drop to 25 fps mentioned in the article, even in sli.
---TK---
Its called allocating memory it does not need that much, the game engine fills up what you have, no problem with 780ti sli maxed @1440p. Though I didnt mess with supersampling except for 2x briefly.
Spets
Simplex
Anyone else noticed this copypasting?
[QUOTE=http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/call_of_duty_advanced_warfare_vga_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,8.html
]Call of Duty Advanced Warfare will NOT make it into our regular benchmark suite for videocards. As stated in the intro, there are many things odd and off. As such we recommend you to look at the performance benchmarks you've just read with a grain of salt as I have been at the verge and threshold of asking myself the question whether or not to post these results. One test run will result on 50 FPS, the second 46 FPS and another 56 FPS. This means that the results shown today are indicative, not a precise measurement.