Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review
Click here to post a comment for Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review on our message forum
moab600
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?
Anth Seebel
Sukovsky
Wow, looks like the next generation of cards will really need 12GB+ ram.. Looks like the GT 930 with 16GB ram for 400 bucks will be really worth it!
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
moab600
Bradders684
The title of some of the graphs need correcting Hilbert, they say MSAA instead of SMAA.
Nice review though. 😀
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Emille
What settings are reflected in the VRAM usage graphs?
Max settings, 2 SMAA?
dbogss
Thank you for the review Hilbert...Cod is actually a nice surprise this year:)
scatman839
Deckard
Hi Hilbert,
What monitor did you use? 32" 3820 x2160 ? im in the market for one
cheers
good review
Bradders684
here.
He uses a ASUS PQ321 for 4k benches, you can see his review of it rl66
interesting on high end GPU but also on lower GPU...
NVidia 760ti and AMD 260X do their job quite well i think, they impress me a lot for their cost.
Deckard
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Correct yes, the ASUS PQ321.
Deckard
Im getting terrible sound stuttering out of sync in cut scenes.
Also when I apply SMAA tx2 the games textures are all corrupted and its running at 5 fps. when I drop to FXAA it seems fine but very granular and washed out. is this normal? excuse the noob question but is SMAA Nvidia exclusive?
Oppps Im an idiot
:stewpid: I had 16x Supersampling
Could really do with a crossfire profiles here too
cheers
Netherwind
ruiner13
Hilbert, aside from a flaky benchmark, is the game... fun?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
CalculuS