AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 CPU performance review

#4442336

Mikedogg

2012-10-29 15:44

This thread needs a rainbow. http://cdbabypodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/kaninaskis_alberta.jpg

#4442339

DSparil

2012-10-29 15:46

oops. disregard

#4442341

Pill Monster

2012-10-29 15:47

Well why dont u buy one then if u can afford it? or ur just talk? ur the one who stupid defending a fail processor whos company laying thousand of people off cuz they not making enough sales wonder why? cuz their cpu deparment sucks! lmao!

Why should I buy one? Just because you think I should have the fastest system around.....? Man you must lead a sheltered life. Some people have other priorities in life and I'm one of those people..... My PC's (all 3 of them) do exactly what I need them to do, I don't feel any need to upgrade. Anyway stick to the topic. If you don't have anything worth adding to this topic (other than "it sucks") then leave the thread.

#4442344

Penal Stingray

2012-10-29 15:50

Why should I buy one? Just because you think I should have the fastest system around.....? Man you must lead a sheltered life. Some people have other priorities in life and I'm one of those people..... My PC's (all 3 of them) do exactly what I need them to do, I don't feel any need to upgrade. Anyway stick to the topic. If you don't have anything worth adding to this topic (other than "it sucks") then leave the thread.

well the processor indeed sucks compare the intel ones lol! but i do like the amd gpu deparment that i cant say its sucks.

#4442346

---TK---

2012-10-29 15:53

state your cases with benchmarks like I did, no need to insult one another

#4442361

DSparil

2012-10-29 16:14

Wow, it appears I missed out on a lot going in this thread. Its all been covered but I will just say this. Those of you here that continue to bash Piledriver fail to realize its everyday desktop performance potential. Gaming isn't the end all, be all. For an overall fast end-user experience, Piledriver is a win and especially at its price. I mean $139.99 for the FX-6300? That is a steal for what you get. Its a solid improvement over Bulldozer and AMD delivered on their promise of the overall performance increase. Even Hilbert said it was a great overall experience and it offered a quick and snappy overall performance. What more do you non believers need? The Intel crowd will never be convinced of anything.

Well why dont u buy one then if u can afford it? or ur just talk? ur the one who stupid defending a fail processor whos company laying thousand of people off cuz they not making enough sales wonder why? cuz their cpu deparment sucks! lmao! hey pal u still rocking a 4 core processor! its 2012 gotta have 8 core or u cant afford one?

and this guy is a bonehead. Get a grip and post when you have something worthwhile to contribute.

#4442364

Agent-A01

2012-10-29 16:23

http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/5267100_700b.jpg seriously tho, threads always turn up like this..

#4442398

MANHOSO

2012-10-29 17:27

"Its clear that the processor is a big improvement in comparison with the latest that AMD been giving us, but it is still far from the Intel level in terms price per performance." lol see and coment :http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-8350+Eight-Core&id=1780 http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_value_available.html do you see !

#4442409

DSparil

2012-10-29 17:35

^ Yes! Thank you for posting those links. Somehow I still think that won't convince any of the Intel bible beaters.

#4442424

sunnyp_343

2012-10-29 17:54

Another clueless idiot.

ya u r noob...i m Pro in hardware world...go study 1st

#4442427

---TK---

2012-10-29 17:55

"Its clear that the processor is a big improvement in comparison with the latest that AMD been giving us, but it is still far from the Intel level in terms price per performance." lol see and coment :http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-8350+Eight-Core&id=1780 http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_value_available.html do you see !

those are some awful benchmarks there. passmark?

#4442429

sunnyp_343

2012-10-29 17:56

I'm just tired of people in here constantly crapping on PD without really knowing how it performs. To save you the trouble it goes like this; PD is faster than i5 in nearly all heavily threaded tests - that includes the 2600K. It's also close behind i7 and even surpasses it once or twice. Single or lightly threaded apps are still not great -def not as fast as i7 but manages to keep within striking distance of i5 a lot of the time. There are a handful of single thread benches it falls well behind IB/SB but compared to BD it's about 15%-20% faster....which means while it can't keep up with IB it still performs well in games. AMD have priced PD accordingly and the MSRP is...ah fuk I can't recall exactly, but it's priced well. A lot less than BD was when it came out anyway. Anyway I'm out so have fun everybody....:)

noob ...Fx is failed to give performance in all games means all games...u go check all benchmarks if u r not dumb...i hope u can read

#4442436

sunnyp_343

2012-10-29 18:01

LOL omg is that all you got. Dude you have no idea. I could prob buy your whole family if I wanted to. Not to mention I get most of my computer parts at wholesale rates, since the company I contact to supply/service IT hardware to about 5000 clients. Think before you make rash comments. :stewpid:

ya and that money gave u be AMD.....he is totally AMD fanboy....dont listen to him guys

#4442437

DSparil

2012-10-29 18:02

noob ...Fx is failed to give performance in all games means all games...u go check all benchmarks if u r not dumb...i hope u can read

You have nothing constructive to contribute and just offer insults. You'd do best to stop it.

#4442442

Pill Monster

2012-10-29 18:04

noob ...Fx is failed to give performance in all games means all games...u go check all benchmarks if u r not dumb...i hope u can read

LOL, a newbie with 36 posts calling me a noob. How ironic. I can read, not too sure about you though, since you missed the part where I said FX was behind in gaming benches, and actually FX did perform - just not as well as Intel. I have at least explained the reasons why I have the opinion I do....what about you? At least put up some benches like TK said earlier....

ya u r noob...i m Pro in hardware world...go study 1st

Is that right? Well if you want to start comparing e-peens then you may as well know I'm an IT Hardware Engineer.....lol Can we get back OT now?

ya and that money gave u be AMD.....he is totally AMD fanboy....dont listen to him guys

Yeah OK...lets do the maths; I'm a 7yr member with ~18,000 posts and ~50 people on my friends list. I don't think I've acquired a reputation as a BS artist....(yet). You are newbie with 36 posts, Can you see where I'm going with this? Btw most people are intelligent and can decide for themselves.... the benchmarks are all around the net...they don't have to listen to me? Or you either.

#4442469

GhostXL

2012-10-29 18:31

LOL, a newbie with 36 posts calling me a noob. How ironic. I can read, not too sure about you though, since you missed the part where I said FX was behind in gaming benches, and actually FX did perform - just not as well as Intel. I have at least explained the reasons why I have the opinion I do....what about you? At least put up some benches like TK said earlier.... Yeah OK...lets do the maths; I'm a 7yr member with ~18,000 posts and ~50 people on my friends list. I don't think I've acquired a reputation as a BS artist....(yet). You are newbie with 36 posts, Can you see where I'm going with this? Btw most people are intelligent and can decide for themselves.... the benchmarks are all around the net...they don't have to listen to me? Or you either.

People just don't see the big picture. If I didn't build this rig I have now, I'd be looking at the FX 8350 no issue. For the price/perf, it would do everything I'd need it to do. People don't realize when they buy cpu's like even I have, we won't be using it fully at all. I think the major reason I updated was so I was futureproof with Pcie 3.0. Other than that it didn't matter much. People just look at benches and go, wow it's so much faster! Yet if you put them behind both machines OC'd to the max, people notice very little difference in performance. Also comments like, "if you can't afford Intel you shouldn't be buying a computer." are so childish it makes me cringe in disgust. There is nothing wrong with AMD CPU's for gaming at 1080p. Not in the slightest. The only people that would benefit from high end extreme intel cpu's, are those that game well beyond 1080p, and even beyond 4k. But that is a VERY small percentage right now.

#4442489