HIS Excalibur IceQ9800 Pro review

Graphics cards 1049 Page 15 of 16 Published by

teaser

Page 15 - Quake III Arena

Performance - Quake III Arena
imageview.php?image=105Quake III Arena, what a revolution this game was when it got released. Now it has become a standard by itself as solid and respectable benchmark utility for journalists .. The game that everybody knows is naturally Quake III Arena. Seriously, who doesn't own it or at least has played it once ? Q3A is of course an excellent game to use as benchmark. It's an up-to-date game and has new options available to test the card to it's maximum. We used the standard Demo001 timedemo.

We tested the videocard with Quake3 Arena in High Quality mode, 32 Bit colors. Available resolutions we tested where 800x600 up to 1600x1200 with quality settings set to maximum.

Of course there are far better benchmarks than Quake III, yet this benchmark always places a graphics card in the right perspective performance wise. Yes, we do not need 200 frames per second. But this benchmark scales the difference in graphics cards just so very nice. More modern and Graphics Core demanding games would of course produce much lower results.

Quake III Arena 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
Radeon 9600 Pro 256 165 81 52 35
Radeon 9600 Pro 173 113 72 48
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra 197 156 104 73
Radeon 9700 Pro 177 166 121 87
9800 Pro HIS 177 171 137 98
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra 200 190 153 113
432/380 176 172 151 110

Quake III is getting outdated yet it still is a very nice benchmark. It measures very precisely. Hey, 98 Frames per Second in 1600x1200 on the Pentium 4 2.8 GHz .. fun to see.

4xAA 8xAF 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
Radeon 9600 Pro 256 94 56 30 22
Radeon 9600 Pro 128 63 42 29
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra 168 88 55 37
Radeon 9700 Pro 174 108 73 51
9800 Pro HIS 175 122 82 57
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra 188 142 100 73

With AA at 4x and AF at 8 levels enabled at an ingame high quality the 9800 Pro manages really nice numbers. Anything above 50-60 Frames per second for any game is more than sufficient though. The custom timedemo we used here, my friends, is totally extreme. Of we'd run a standard demo001 we'd see scores of 300+ FPS, so keep that in mind. Normal ingame performance will be higher then the number you see above.

 imageview.php?image=104

Share this content
Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print