HIS Excalibur IceQ9800 Pro review

Graphics cards 1049 Page 10 of 16 Published by

teaser

Page 10 - Aquamark 3

Aquamark 3The latest graphics cards on the market are almost all DirectX9 compatible these days, and we also see an increasing number of games utilizing the new DX9 features. To be ableam3-tease.jpg to see how well a graphics cards is performing in this new challenging DirectX 9 environment, AquaMark was developed.

The AquaMark3 benchmark delivers scores for specific hardware components as well as an overall score for the entire system. AquaMark3 is highly qualified to meet the needs of gamers because it's as close as possible to a typical game application. The AquaMark benchmarking series is based directly on the huge code and data base of the AquaNox games and the underlying krass game engine."

In the past we have used AquaMark 2.3 in our benchmark suite and although still a reputable application, Massive figured it was time for the next best thing. This is AquaMark 3, a benchmark that will utilize some of the finest DirectX 9 capabilities like Pixel and Vertex Shaders 2.0, and yet is by far not as Shader dependant as Half-Life is, for example. You will notice that in the overall results later in this article.

AquaMark 3, however, is not solely a DirectX9 benchmark; if you are working with a DirectX 8 or 7 compatible graphics card, you will still be able to use it just with a lot of graphical features missing. Make no mistake, AquaMark3 is a DirectX 9 benchmark. But since it's based on a real game engine it has fallbacks to DirectX 8 and even DirectX 7 making this software not a 100% DX9 benchmark.

Download: Aquamark 3 (63 MB)

AquaMark 3 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
FX 5600 Ultra 45.23 24 21 17 13
FX 5600 Ultra 51.75 24 21 16 13
9600 256 3.6 29 23 17 13
9600 Pro 3.6 31 25 19 14
9700 Pro 3.6 46 41 33 26
9800 Pro 3.6 49 45 37 30
9800 Pro 3.7 49 45 38 30
FX 5900 Ultra 45.23 47 44 39 33
FX 5900 Ultra 51.75 50 47 40 34
9800 Pro HIS 49 44 38 30

Time for the new AquaMark 3 then. The results you see here are for the bigger part taken from our Aquamark review in which we used several driver revisions to show differences between the driver builds. The 9800 is slightly below the GeForce FX 5900. Let's turn on quality settings at 8x Anisotropic filtering and 4x Anti aliasing and see what happens then.

4xAA 8xAF 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
FX 5600 Ultra 45.23 17 13 10 7
FX 5600 Ultra 51.75 18 14 11 8
9600 256 3.6 21 16 12 8
9600 Pro 3.6 24 18 13 9
FX 5900 Ultra 45.23 37 31 23 18
9700 Pro 3.6 39 32 24 19
FX 5900 Ultra 51.75 42 35 26 21
9800 Pro 3.6 43 36 27 21
9800 Pro 3.7 43 36 28 21
9800 Pro HIS 43 36 27 21
432/380 46 40 31 24

Really nice results here. The Radeon is more efficient with quality settings then the GeForce FX. And although very similar results this is impressive to observe. Also look at the overclocked results again, really nice.

Copyright 2003 - Guru3D.com

Share this content
Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print