Watch the AMD CES 2019 Event & CEO Dr. Lisa Su Keynote Here

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Watch the AMD CES 2019 Event & CEO Dr. Lisa Su Keynote Here on our message forum
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Let's go, hopefully product announcements!
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
Ugh, wish they would start on time.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Did Jensen sent Lucky charm Jacket to Lisa?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252776.jpg
Radeon 7 announced. 30% faster then vega 64 at the same power on 7nm. 16GB HBM 2 mem 1TB/sec.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
The Reeferman:

Radeon 7 announced. 30% faster then vega 64 at the same power on 7nm. 16GB HBM 2 mem 1TB/sec.
RTX 2080 performance level. Likely Compute performance around 2080 Ti. Only question unanswered is price. It should be noted that Lisa said 60 CUs instead of 64 in Vega 64.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156348.jpg
Fox2232:

RTX 2080 performance level. Likely Compute performance around 2080 Ti. Only question unanswered is price. It should be noted that Lisa said 60 CUs instead of 64 in Vega 64.
Yeah no matter how good it is if it's 1k i'm not interested.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252776.jpg
Fox2232:

RTX 2080 performance level. Likely Compute performance around 2080 Ti. Only question unanswered is price. It should be noted that Lisa said 60 CUs instead of 64 in Vega 64.
price at $699. Not bad Only question remains at what power draw, judging by the 3 fan cooler on their reference card I guess it'll be on the high side.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/233/233345.jpg
The Reeferman:

price at $699. Not bad Only question remains at what power draw, judging by the 3 fan cooler on their reference card I guess it'll be on the high side.
Not really. 599 would be a good price but when I can pick up 2080 with RT technology for the same price then guess what will I choose?
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
Biały Wilk:

Not really. 599 would be a good price but when I can pick up 2080 with RT technology for the same price then guess what will I choose?
Hello to Mars! How is the red planet doing? 699$ for RTX 2080? What?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
The Reeferman:

price at $699. Not bad Only question remains at what power draw, judging by the 3 fan cooler on their reference card I guess it'll be on the high side.
2x 8-pin and Lisa mentioned same power draw as Vega. I guess Vega 64.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/173/173315.jpg
Pretty much no information or numbers on Zen 2. Disappointing.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
Huh. I thought they were going to tell about Navi, not that rebaked Vega.
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
Seems like Vega 7nm refresh is what we are getting.....we are stuck with RTX and Vega.....
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
New Ryzen clocks all cores under full load to 4.4GHz instead of 4GHz. And matches 9900k in total performance. Not bad, not great. I hoped for those 12C/24T to have something to upgrade to. This 15% performance bump is not enough for me. As for Radeon 7. I did not want to buy Vega and that stands. I guess, I'll have to wait for Navi bit longer. (That's unless 7nm Vega fixed mishaps of Vega 64.) I/O Die on desktop chip is surprising a bit. What's more surprising is placement. Guys, Now we have to test all rotations of cooling solutions to find best one.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/190/190660.jpg
Whiplashwang:

Pretty much no information or numbers on Zen 2. Disappointing.
They did a Cinebench run i9 9900k stock vs the new 8 core Zen stock ( not final version ) . i9 9900k got 2040 points, Zen got 2057 points at 30% less power.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
Fox2232:

New Ryzen clocks all cores under full load to 4.4GHz instead of 4GHz. And matches 9900k in total performance. Not bad, not great. I hoped for those 12C/24T to have something to upgrade to. This 15% performance bump is not enough for me. As for Radeon 7. I did not want to buy Vega and that stands. I guess, I'll have to wait for Navi bit longer. (That's unless 7nm Vega fixed mishaps of Vega 64.) I/O Die on desktop chip is surprising a bit. What's more surprising is placement. Guys, Now we have to test all rotations of cooling solutions to find best one.
lol, yeah, the CPU core (the smaller chip) is located up in the corner there at the edge of the heatspreader, and that's where most of the heat is gonna be coming from, and also not the most heatpipe covered place of the total footprint!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/271/271560.jpg
1) Radeon VII on games i've played has done just as well as RTX 2080 ti. in real world conditions it is probably in-between 2080 and 2080ti. 2) nothing is wrong with Vega cores and this is not rebaked in any sense. the power draw is way down, the clock speeds are almost 50% higher (1850MHz) this is far better than just a die shrink, it is 2nd generation AND a die shrink.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270233.jpg
Robbo9999:

lol, yeah, the CPU core (the smaller chip) is located up in the corner there at the edge of the heatspreader, and that's where most of the heat is gonna be coming from, and also not the most heatpipe covered place of the total footprint!
I'm curious about the layout though. It seems like they could fit another 7nm chiplet underneath. Not sure what that empty space is for otherwise.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Robbo9999:

lol, yeah, the CPU core (the smaller chip) is located up in the corner there at the edge of the heatspreader, and that's where most of the heat is gonna be coming from, and also not the most heatpipe covered place of the total footprint!
Thinking about Ryzen again. They did show 8C/16T for reason. To have core count same on both systems. IT actually does not mean there may not be 12C/24T And because CPU core is offset, there can be 2nd one at other free corner.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/190/190660.jpg
Yeah, I think the goal was to go with 8 core vs 8 core and show that they can deliver the same ( or slightly higher ) performance at ~30% less power.