DeViLzzz:

Eh when it comes to phones I will trust Samsung but as for tvs they have so many versions of tvs compared to not even 10 years ago and it has lowered the quality overall of their tv products in my opinion. It is nice that they are trying to cater more to the gamers out there but if I am going to throw real money at a tv I will be doing it by buying Sony. I just helped pick out a tv that would also make an awesome monitor even at 49". Also as for QLED eh nothing special. If these companies could make OLED more assuredly safe from burn in then I would be excited more about tvs.

Camaxide:

Oleds can’t be made safe from burnin, and gaming or computers are likely the worst scenarios for getting burnin, its why Oled is inferior for this. What will come is the micro-led, which will be pretty much what you ask for 🙂

Spartas:

So.. with the implementation of FreeSync Premium, how will the NVIDIA G-SYNC compatibility be on RTX cards now? will there still be issues with tearing on the RTX 2080 ti in games with G-SYNC enabled? I think so. LG CX remains the best choice for gaming on NVIDIA cards at least IMO.

Loobyluggs:

What's really annoying about all of this, is e-tailers are quite deceptive with regards to the HDMI cables they sell and whether they are or, are not; 2.1 Try it. Try going to an e-tailer and run a search on HDMI 2.1 Cables and see just how many supposed cables it lists actually are 2.1. The main problem is that the 2.0b specification does allow for 7680 × 4320 BUT it is only for 30 frames a second, with a groutesque 4:2:0 (barely YouTube quality), it does NOT do HDR10 and it most certainly does not do Auto Low Latency Mode and 'taps out' at 60 fps, with a gimped 4:2:2 pallete. You want 144fps, ALLM, HDR, 4KUHD? 2.0b is NOT gonna cut it, yet e-tailers will list 2.0b is being perfectly fine for this. Sorry for the rant, but it's such a simple thing for etailers to get right, yet; they get wrong and try to deceive you.

dcGColts:

Equivalent would be LG CX, equivalent to c9 is Q90R

Toss3:

OLED burn in really isn't that big of an issue => plenty of tests show that you would have to leave it on for 24 hours a day at peak brightness to get any form of permanent burn in. Think people confuse image retention with burn in when it comes to OLEDs. The issue with using current OLED TVs as displays isn't just about burn-in though, but about the subpixels used; the current LG panels use RGBW subpixels, meaning they have less subpixels than regular displays. This leads to fonts not looking sharp etc and at 3840x2160 at 48 inches that isn't good enough. It would work great as a secondary screen though for gaming/movies.

Loobyluggs:

What's really annoying about all of this, is e-tailers are quite deceptive with regards to the HDMI cables they sell and whether they are or, are not; 2.1 Try it. Try going to an e-tailer and run a search on HDMI 2.1 Cables and see just how many supposed cables it lists actually are 2.1. The main problem is that the 2.0b specification does allow for 7680 × 4320 BUT it is only for 30 frames a second, with a groutesque 4:2:0 (barely YouTube quality), it does NOT do HDR10 and it most certainly does not do Auto Low Latency Mode and 'taps out' at 60 fps, with a gimped 4:2:2 pallete. You want 144fps, ALLM, HDR, 4KUHD? 2.0b is NOT gonna cut it, yet e-tailers will list 2.0b is being perfectly fine for this. Sorry for the rant, but it's such a simple thing for etailers to get right, yet; they get wrong and try to deceive you.

chainy:

On amazon there's good cable's like this one : https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B07ZRVBMY9/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1