Confirmed fake VEGA10 Benchmarks
Click here to post a comment for Confirmed fake VEGA10 Benchmarks on our message forum
CPC_RedDawn
Oh please AMD
name this FURY XP!!!
it would make Nvidia so salty LOL
I bet they will name it something like FURY XT or XTX or a slightly more overclocked version. Bring back to old names we had with the X1900 series 😀
FM57
Are the benchmarks for the other cards correct ? That would add credibility to the Vega numbers (or not)
Keesberenburg
It is fake haha.
fantaskarsef
These are not the droids you are looking for.
Bogeyx
Im quite surprised, too.
Someone did the math? Vega to Fury is always nearly exactly a 1.66 ratio. Too solid to be real.
warlord
Vega IS A SOLID replacement for those with decapitated 1070/980TI/FURY X
That's a pure win if it's priced properly.
New tech 2017's aroma and GGWP 🙂
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
So these charts are mimicked from SweClockers. I just had a chat with them, and they do confirm they most definitely didn't make them.
100% fake you guys.
-Tj-
btw I uploaded them to postimage.org and linked that album.
Originally found it here @ local site
https://slo-tech.com/forum/t679540/449
and ye probably fake though..
edit: ah ok HH then that's that. sry folks.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
No not even probably, they are confirmed fake.
warlord
Thanks for clarifying that they are not legit HH. We should be more alert and patient for the truth behind VEGA's performance to be revealed.
xrodney
There is absolutely zero chance AMD would gave samples 5 or so months before release and just month after getting 1st working prototype.
Only possibility would be to steal one of Vega demo PC's from CES but that's highly unlikely.
1st we would already hear about it and 2nd there would be line of dead bodies between AMD booth and exit from CES 🙂
Possibility performance scaling consistently with Fury in all games is close to absolute zero and as HH confirmed its 100% fake.
Denial
About what? TJ sourcing info from random forum posts again? Purposely not linking it because he knew the source was terrible? I was going to comment on this thread last night, but I was kind of curious how long it was going to be before someone even asked where he got the graphs from.
I feel like the rules about news posts should be updated.. rumors should just go to their respective subs unless Hilbert is posting it himself. All user threads in here must have a credible source or something.
Dygaza
How would that add credibility? You just get old graph and add new results. Results itself are quite easy to fake to look reliable aswell since you know which game works well for AMD or Nvidia.
Stormyandcold
It's ok, I was getting excited for a moment there about the potential price-drops and competition. That's coming from a long-time Nvidia user.
Denial
Honestly I expect the final product to be similar if not better than these graphs. But just because we think that's the case, doesn't mean people should post fake graphs sourced from random posts because the numbers "feel" right.
isidore
lol, I think 90% of the time when "fake benchmarks" got leaked they provide almost the same performance as the final product when released. I expect same numbers if not a bit faster due to last optimization.
TheDeeGee
But how much Wattage does it need to achieve that? 500?
-Tj-
again?
there was no source, you can drop that attitude as well.
ps ive seen far worse fake leaks posted here.
Loophole35
I don't expect it to use anymore than Fiji XT honestly.
BoMbY
Fake. Way too early. The release is month away. No press event yet (like Macau), no samples in public, etc. But the fake results may not be far away from the real deal.
