Confirmed fake VEGA10 Benchmarks
Click here to post a comment for Confirmed fake VEGA10 Benchmarks on our message forum
-Tj-
PrMinisterGR
Losing the DAI bench made this look much more real to me. I don't believe that anyone has actual hardware in their hands though.
-Tj-
ScoobyDooby
Looks good! Very promising indeed.. this gives me hope for a cheaper 1080TI
alanm
Like Fury X it probably excels more at 4k than below that. Only reason I can think of due to all 9 benches in 4k.
Stormyandcold
Very good. However, it's looking so good that I'm expecting prices closer to £700, rather than £600.
An interesting observation; even Titan XP and Vega are only "good enough" or "just about" cards for 4k gaming. The real 4k60 "bells and whistles" cards are not here yet.
On a side-note, it's obvious that GTX1080Ti can't beat Vega either, so, Nvidia is going to have to have a re-think. If the benchmarks are real, I would release GTX1080Ti straight away before it becomes less appealing. The other way is to release Volta, but, everyone's been saying it's no where near ready for at least a year...
Maddness
If it performs as well as those benches, then it's going to be awesome. Probably bloody expensive, but awesome none the less. Also 1080Ti will most probably be between the 1080 and Titan. So Nvidia doesn't really have anything that will blow it out of the water. Great news for us. Still take it with a grain of salt as of now.
sverek
Radeon R9 380X release price : $229
Radeon R9 390X release price : $429
Radeon RX 480 release price : $239 (8 GB)
Radeon RX 490 release price : $439 - $499 ???
A man can dream. If they going above $500, it shouldn't be 4xx and rather be nametag, like Fury.
Maddness
Carfax
dudecat64
I would only assume these cards will be around $600 price point if these benches indicate anything. Problem will be keeping them in stock.
sverek
Havel
Denial will be happy 😀
Han2K
It's not a leak, it's a fake.
Mannerheim
Guru3dreader
If this is the "small" Vega, these numbers are not bad. That, if we assume that the "big" Vega is much faster and of course that these numbers are not random guesses from someone.
cryohellinc
People, read the Initial post, wth, hype all you want but it clearly states that this is 99% fake. Yet people hype as always and await a 500$ Titan P equivalent...
JonasBeckman
A nice improvement over the Fury GPU, assuming these are genuine that is.
Good competition with the 1080 too although not a clear win so the 1080Ti should one be in the works and ready to release soon will be interesting as well assuming it's not quite as exclusive as the Titan X(P) is. 🙂
(But then what is VEGA going to be priced at? Probably not the 480 level at least heh.)
EDIT: As far as overclocking goes that's a unknown too at the moment I suppose, doubt HBM2 is unlocked officially but would be nice if it was and Wattman could make some fine tuning easier without first waiting for Afterburner / TriXX to be updated with whatever this GPU has.
Voltage primarily I'd assume would be the main thing for getting good OC and of course also HBM2 should that be doable whether it's clock speed, voltage or both and then bios editing will probably follow later on as usual.
(Depending on various factors I guess.)
EDIT: Though AMD just recently demoed the GPU in some duct-taped, glued up config with a engineer sample (Long card is looong. :P ) so the chances of some review models being sent out already is probably slim thus lowering the chances of these being genuine.
AlmondMan
"Very likely fake benchmarks" - everyone comments as if real.
MainFrame Alpha
As Hilbert stated "the card is not even fabbed yet" so these must be fake or someone manged to put there hands somehow on an engineering sample :3eyes:
were Razor Valerie prototypes the only things stolen from CES? 🤓
AMD fans please stop hyping or you will end up getting disappointed :bang: