Nvidia will release mainstream GP106 GPUs later this year

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Nvidia will release mainstream GP106 GPUs later this year on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
All that power just to play terrible console ports? Oh man! Letยดs hope the VR take off soon.
d r e a m i n g. VR and 4K won't be there before 2017/2018, and 4K might become relevant before VR do. This PS4.1 story is good for PC also, means devs are gonna be able to push things a little further. lol, between VR, 4K, DirectX12, Marketing need to get their shlt together lol.. Feel free to pledge to Star Citizen, here is my referral code: PCM-ASTE-RRACE (it's a joke, don't call SWAT to my house)
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
Would be cool to see something like a 1060 Ti (1600-1800) Cudas.... for around $220 that would be a Hott seller in my opinion.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169957.jpg
Would be cool to see something like a 1060 Ti (1600-1800) Cudas.... for around $220 that would be a Hott seller in my opinion.
1664 SPs, ~1700mhz, ~220GB/s memory ~ 120w
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Man I don't give a **** about people :P People are idiots :P People buy AIO watercoolers (sorry !) I've literally been juggling a bunch of prospective buyers for my 980Ti for 3 weeks now, and I'm still ****ing undecided :P I can get ~560 euros for my card If ~560 euros gets me a 20% performance increase (over a stock 980Ti) then it's worth it for me I'm sure the cards will cost more than the MSRP initially, and i'd have to wait for the AIB cards... probably an extra month and an extra 50 euros. tldr: X80 @ 600 euros with 980ti +20% stock is bare minimum to make the change worth it If not 30 euros worth of fujipoly thermal pads, some gelid extreme and :banana: I know, I know, only considering Pascal is stupid; but I need CUDA. Unless AMD has their cuda interpreter ready, and it's been tested, I'm sticking to the greedy green team
You would change it for a 1350MHz 980Ti @ those up to 20%? seems like a waste in a waste.. Money and difference. Imo from a 980TI owner only full GP100 is worth it, rest is not relevant. Well unless you now feel "left out" because you have a "dated" gpu and new mid-range perf chip can run the same and you want to be in a new upgrade loop. ๐Ÿ˜€
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169957.jpg
You would change it for a 1350MHz 980Ti @ those up to 20%? seems like a waste in a waste.. Money and difference. Imo from a 980TI owner only full GP100 is worth it, rest is not relevant. Well unless you now feel "left out" because you have a "dated" gpu and new mid-range perf chip can run the same and you want to be in a new upgrade loop. ๐Ÿ˜€
2x FP16 would make it worth it even if at the end it performs slightly slower than my 980ti@ 1500 for fp32
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
What do you mean by 2x FP16? From what I saw this is only Tesla specific, I kind of doubt geforce benefits from such stuff..
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169957.jpg
What do you mean by 2x FP16? From what I saw this is only Tesla specific, I kind of doubt geforce benefits from such stuff..
that's why i'm waiting
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/38/38873.jpg
I dont think we will see the GTX1080Ti soon, i think the release will be very similar to the GTX780 and GTX980, where their Ti counter parts where released 6-8 months later. My guess is GTX1080/1070 = June 2016 (Announced on Computex) GTX1060/1050 = December 2016 GTX1080Ti = February 2017 (probably announced in CES)
data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp
I dont think we will see the GTX1080Ti soon, i think the release will be very similar to the GTX780 and GTX980, where their Ti counter parts where released 6-8 months later. My guess is GTX1080/1070 = June 2016 (Announced on Computex) GTX1060/1050 = December 2016 GTX1080Ti = February 2017 (probably announced in CES)
Indeed.. Maxwell "relase date strategy" was good/profitable for Nvidia. So they may use similar or same plan for a Pascal. Also more harder "handle" many GPU lines in same time...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
^ That plan started with Kepler GK104 chip (680gtx), by Fermi GF104/114 it was too weak vs AMD high-end so they couldn't do such pricing.. Imo its crazy, but people will always buy it even if its overpriced.. I would say by nv its only top tier gpus that are worth and will last much longer. I mean so far any of these Gx104/114/204 chips showed its real place ๐Ÿ˜›c1: