NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti 3DMark Benchmark Results
Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti 3DMark Benchmark Results on our message forum
Robbo9999
It looks like we're all roughly in the same score for GTX 1070 overclocked on Firestrike Extreme - here's mine just now:
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/13898056
And Timespy for good measure:
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/2570040
Only 3% off GTX 1070ti, although GTX 1070ti not overclocked, of course not worth the upgrade from GTX 1070.
nattefrost
now just a matter of finding stock and reasonably priced
Robbo9999
They might not mind much it eating into GTX 1080 sales, perhaps the GTX 1070ti has larger profit margins for them at the moment - perhaps at the moment production favours the slightly reduced core count of the GTX 1070ti and GDDR5 over GDDR5X.
fry178
@The Goose
Even if that doesn't boost as high out of the box, it still has "more" hardware (cores/rop etc) that you won't be able to make up for by oc a 1070 alone.
I tested both 1060 as 3 and as 6gb and even that the 3gb boosts about 200mhz higher, its still not enough to make up for the missing cores.
And its way closer in total count, than the 1070 is to the ti...
Not talking about the fact you most likely won't be able to sell it for what you paid for it..
BReal85
Yeah, they just couldn't stand Vega56 was faster than the 1070 (even after nearly 1,5 year) so they made a card that is a bit faster than the Vega56. Why would they make a 1060Ti, which would be a 100 times reasonable, as there is double gap until the 1070 than bw the 1070 and 1080. Lolvidia.
Don't forget that there will be no reference 1070Ti, so this should be an AIB model, meaning that a 1070 custom is faster than 5699 TimeSpy points.
Also, the other results also show (Firestrike and AotS results)it will be exactly halfway through the ref 1070 and 1080, meaning that in the target resolution, 1440P, will be about 2-3% faster than the Vega56, and may be on par with it in 4K.
There was no reason to make the 1070Ti. Having a 1070 OCd can achieve what the 1070Ti can.
sverek
Unlike 970 and 980, there bigger performance gap between 1070 and 1080. It was a matter of time.
Also makes perfect excuse for 9xx series owners to buy this card.
cowie
^not only that but it gives the aib partner's something new to make and sell.
there is a point when they will run out of 1080/1070 chips if they have not stopped making them already.
so many over priced amd cards at most etailers I hope they stay under 450usd
NewTRUMP Order
That is a Firestrike score not Time Spy. What is your Time Spy score cuz thats what the bencmark is?
I seriously doubt Nvidia will lock the cards. You can already buy a Gtx 1070 and overclock it to tears and get near stock 1080 results.
DeadMan3000
It's a good job my flashed RX Vega 56 to 64 equals a reference GTX 1080 then. Roll on those feature enabled AMD drivers. 🙂
ladcrooks
The card is made for people that cannot afford a 1080 and dont like to OC. Also for those who like the word ti, same as gt on a car.
The milking carries on 😀
Noisiv
EXactly.
I dunno if anyone remembers but in the goold ole days Nvidia was building full fat chips, none of this cut down bs with limited bandwidth.
And they were going door to door begging ppl to take their chips for free.
Quad SLI was the default giveaway, SINGLE GPU only if you had explained y u no like 4 GPU. Wait... no no, I think that was bubonic plague that was FREE. For a GPU you were always supposed to dish out some hard earned CASH.
alanm
I dont see any milking. The card is entirely based as a viable alternative to vega 56. Thats its purpose.
Robbo9999
Really!? I've never heard of anyone flashing a Vega56 to a Vega64, I thought that was impossible due to the hardware differences? You mean you actually have more cores enabled now, the same amount as Vega64?
Fender178
Since this card reminds me of the 560 Ti 448 core and that card when OC'ed was close to a Stock 570 in terms of Performance. Did that card eat into the 570's sales I don't think so because an OC'ed 570 would really out perform a 560 ti 448 core. I don't see how the 1070 ti would eat 1080 sales if you have good overclock on your 1080 wouldn't that really out perform a good OC'ed 1070 Ti?
Robbo9999
GTX 1080 only has just a few more cores than GTX 1070ti, not many more at all. GTX 1080 does have the faster GDDR5X for a higher bandwidth - I'd imagine that there wouldn't be a big difference between overclocked GTX 1070ti & overclocked GTX 1080. I think this GTX 1070ti will eat into GTX 1080 sales, but I don't think NVidia mind that. I'm guessing that NVidia would rather manufacture GTX 1070ti over GTX 1080, and perhaps they're gonna see increased profits per unit from GTX 1070ti due to silicon availability that might suit GTX 1070ti production (slightly fewer active cores) over GTX 1080, and perhaps GDDR5 availability & price is significantly better than GDDR5X, all resulting in a product with overall increased profit margins - (my theory!).
fry178
@BReal85
So compare performance of two cards with one being oced and the other not, right.
The ti has 500 cores more, you will never be able to make up for that with oc.
And as soon as the ti is oced, it will faster again...
Noisiv
according to 3dcenter and posts on their forum it seems that indeed Nvidia has been having the problem of 1070Ti being too close in to 1080
having almost the same number of shaders and then either some games do not care about bandwidth (or perhaps GDDR5X not being as efficient as GDDR5, remember GPU mining?) has made them experiment with different BIOSes in order to tame the little beast
cowie
the 570' were not much faster then the 448 when both were over clocked
the only things the fo foty 8 has in common with the 70ti
it comes after 1 and a half years after its brothers flooded in the market
its placement against amd
sure no dought overclocking as the norm with the card don't let them scare you and when you do you will have a cheap 1080.
its all about price atm
one thing and maybe the greatest it wont have Is unlocked bios for voltage cooling and clock speeds
the one I hate the most ....no tri voltage in afterburner
when done right you are running 580 numbers at times
so really this card is no 448.
ladcrooks
Your right there , and if vega 56 wasnt around it would still happen! Milking the same cow, the product virtually give or take, but get more for it.
