New custom AMD Energy plan from 1usmus might bring in an extra 250 MHz on clock frequency

Published by

Click here to post a comment for New custom AMD Energy plan from 1usmus might bring in an extra 250 MHz on clock frequency on our message forum
#5727487
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/63/63170.jpg
nizzen:

Full stock bios without folowing the steps with "global c-states control, power supply idle control, etc.... : 4689 boost on one core 😀 https://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_11_2019/post-42975-0-20869100-1572890403.png
So, its better with the Stock Bios than the "Beta Bios" ? Stock Bios as in the latest one available, but not Beta ? As in 1.0.0.3 ABBA ? 🙂 Can you put which Bios you used exactly, etc ? (I can quickly see this being a sh!t-show where we have no idea who's using what Bios/AGESA/Etc...)
#5727492
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Evildead666:

So, its better with the Stock Bios than the "Beta Bios" ? Stock Bios as in the latest one available, but not Beta ? As in 1.0.0.3 ABBA ? 🙂 Can you put which Bios you used exactly, etc ? (I can quickly see this being a sh!t-show where we have no idea who's using what Bios/AGESA/Etc...)
2.46 beta bios Stock as in default settings in bios. https://www.asrock.com/mb/AMD/X570%20Taichi/#BIOS
#5727528
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
It already is quite the shitshow as AMD are way, way behind their game with the software releases for their recent hardware (Ryzen 3000 and Radeon 5700). Hardware was probably ready - really hard to validate whether that's the case - while the software was at most git HEAD state (assuming they even heard of such advanced software engineering things over there). Given that most of ATI's / AMD's bad reputation with subpar drivers comes from back when the drivers were developed in America, I'm curious to see how they get it straight now that AGESAs are developed in India (based on popular belief at /r/amd) and the 5700 branch is developed in China. 4 months after launch and it's still an artesian fountain of shit.
#5727533
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
foxX:

It already is quite the shitshow as AMD are way, way behind their game with the software releases for their recent hardware (Ryzen 3000 and Radeon 5700). Hardware was probably ready - really hard to validate whether that's the case - while the software was at most git HEAD state (assuming they even heard of such advanced software engineering things over there). Given that most of ATI's / AMD's bad reputation with subpar drivers comes from back when the drivers were developed in America, I'm curious to see how they get it straight now that AGESAs are developed in India (based on popular belief at /r/amd) and the 5700 branch is developed in China. 4 months after launch and it's still an artesian fountain of crap.
AMD is cheaper per core for a reason 😉
#5727534
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189980.jpg
Kool64:

I think Microsoft was "suprised" by the 3k series Ryzen chips. between needing a special thread scheduler and power plan. Needless to say I welcome the free extra performance.
Not to mention the big epic surprise was Threadripper, Windows scheduler wasn't up to snuff. But maybe they fixed it by now.
#5727538
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/249/249528.jpg
anticupidon:

Not to mention the big epic surprise was Threadripper, Windows scheduler wasn't up to snuff. But maybe they fixed it by now.
Nah, got a 2950x at work and a 1700 at home. The 2950x is locked at 4.2 and my personal rig at 3.8, the 1700 performs way better in everyday tasks. The only time the 2950x feels faster is if i render something at 4k/8k. Not sure on what to pin the blame for the sluggish performance. Ram at both rigs is the same. On the TR its even quad channel.. the motherboard is that beasty X399 MEG. For now TR is a no go from my personal experience. //lil p.s By everyday tasks i mean opening programs, closing them, switching between them. Hell, even opening Task manager on the threadripper lags. I see it in white for 4 seconds before it utilizes its full interface whilst on my personal rig its instant. The windows is legal, up to date, every driver is up to date, even the gpu is a 2080 Ti so it ain't a factor. Idk what the hell is wrong with the system but i did end up trying a 1950x at another workplace and it was the same damn thing.
#5727553
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/272/272918.jpg
i get around 400+ points extra using the cpuz multi thread bench, but not seeing any higher core boosts than 4400. No change in temps or voltages, but it is under a 360 rad with noctuas blasting through.
#5727566
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259045.jpg
Guess I will wait for 1.0.0.4 to be released for my board before I try this again, temps are roughly the same, but I have 2x420mm rads 😉, less boost freq under load, 4.1-4.0 in CB20 MT vs 4.2-4.3, also I see 12 points less in single thread on cpu-z 528 vs 540, 180 points less in CB20 multi thread 4891 vs 5071 but only 4 points less in single thread CB20, 513 vs 517. Guess some of it could be within margin of error though. Maybe it will help with new SMU.
#5727571
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/266/266726.jpg
geogan:

CCD is the individual chiplets and each one had 4 CCX cores in it... What's the difference between a CCD overclock and a CCX overclock?? Can they all be targetted individually or something?
you can overclock each CCX individually(2 per ccd), so if you have say a 3950x, you could have ccx1 at 4.5ghz, ccx2 at 4.3 ccx3 at 4.4 and ccx 4 at 4.2.
#5727873
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220214.jpg
user1:

you can overclock each CCX individually(2 per ccd), so if you have say a 3950x, you could have ccx1 at 4.5ghz, ccx2 at 4.3 ccx3 at 4.4 and ccx 4 at 4.2.
Really? I didn't notice the individual overclock settings in my ASUS BIOS (Hero VIII) for my 3900X ?!? Think there is only one value for CPU voltage there.
#5728268
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
i get much better result on 1.0.03 abba than 1.0.0.4 beta biios with this power profile and bios settings, doesnt boost past 4525mhz on 1.0.0.4 adn i get full boost 4.6 on abba 1.0.0.3 asrock steel legend x570 3900x
#5728715
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
I notice my 3900X cores stay under 3800 more then they boost to 4500 as they did before applying this profile. One core been hitting 4700 on boost.
#5728794
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/166/166907.jpg
Initial testing, not seeing any difference with 3900x and X570. Same 4625 max clock. Comparing 1003 bios to 1004 with this power plan.
#5728823
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230258.jpg
nizzen:

AMD is cheaper per core for a reason 😉
Well, intel slashes cpu prices by 50% for a reason. 🙂
#5728826
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/147/147322.jpg
So I had a good mood, so I thought, why not try it on Ryzen 2600? After I ran TC Breakpoint benchmark, it ended in a while with one core running at 100% while other cores only 1% 😀

Previous Page