MSI B450 Teaser Mentions 8-core "and up" CPU Support
Click here to post a comment for MSI B450 Teaser Mentions 8-core "and up" CPU Support on our message forum
cryohellinc
Zen 2 here I come!
https://i.gifer.com/4sFg.gif
fantaskarsef
hehe putting on your 1000 yard stare, are you? 😀
Yeah, waiting for Zen2 also...
DaLoona
More then 8 cores and then a simple 4-phase power design on the board
http://memesbams.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Funny-no-gif2.gif
RzrTrek
I would much rather like to see higher clock speeds (or "ipc") at this point.
cryohellinc
DiceAir
D3M1G0D
As the article states, it's most likely a slip-up, although I wouldn't rule it out completely. After all, it was previously thought that TR wouldn't go above 16 cores, but now 24 and 32 cores are the reality. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised to see a Ryzen 7/9 with 12 cores in the next couple of years.
Fox2232
waltc3
Doesn't MSI advertise "Core Boost" for their x399 TR mboards, too? In that case, it makes perfect sense, I suppose.
JamesSneed
Just a typo, nothing to see. They likely copy pasted from Threadripper marketing by accident. It's not like that quad phase power would really power a large CPU.
wavetrex
AMD did 6-core cluster before.
Remember Phenom II X6 ?
It was based on the exact same core, but they somehow managed to add two more.
I see no reason why a Zen 2 CCX could not have 6, or even 8 cores, making single-die 16-core future CPU.
Alternatively, having 4 CCX on one die instead of 2... for 16, 12, 8 cores (when 4, 3 or 2 cores work in each CCX)
urbancamper
Also waiting for Zen 2. Found this board at the Egg.
https://www.gigabyte.com/us/Motherboard/B450-AORUS-PRO-WIFI-rev-10#kf
Oh ya this is 8 phase. Also an AsRock mini that looks like 6 phase
Silva
wavetrex
https://www.chiphell.com/thread-1884097-1-1.html
Some rumors on Chiphell about Zen2... 16 cores for AM4, 32 cores for TR4, 64 cores for SP3, with ~10% increase in IPC as well.
If coupled with a bit of frequency increase as well ... these will be some real freekin' monster CPU's !
JamesSneed
blazngun
More cores is nice and all, but until games and mainstream software can utilize 8c/16t, it is meaningless for most of us. Gains elsewhere in chip design would bring more immediate benefit until the software community catches up.
EspHack
at first I totally dismissed it as a typo, but then again they are shrinking to 12nm, maybe its juuuuust barely enough to fit 2 extra cores per CCX without IGP now? and also intel is about to present their 8 core so AMD surely would want to keep the core count upper hand
but even then why claim "8 and up" when it obviously starts from 4 cores ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Crazy Serb
Fox2232
HWgeek
I also think they are aiming to 8c per ccx but it will be as an answer for Intel's move, for now AMD only needs the IPC bump and clock speeds, so even 8C Ryzen 3700X with turbo clock up-to 4.6Ghz is enough to compete against intel.
But if Intel try to make price cuts and release more cores then AMD will Unleash the Up-to 16C Ryzens..
Also I am sure that many Intel users with old 4 cores CPUs up-to 7700K will be happy to upgrade to the new Zen 2.