When was that possible i in my 40's and dont remeber a time that was possible?, the modular thing would be cool but probably huge nightmare to make working drivers for it
Those cards were pre-GPU like this Diamond Stealth 64 i had. IIRC Matrox also had cards with sockets for more vram. I cannot think of a single "GPU" that had such a features. It was so long ago that i remember having to get my mom to drive me to Frys to get the card so maybe circa 1990?
http://tmp2k.com/images_c/46109d81ab0ce418f88b532552328a20.jpg
Its not bold its a fact. Point me person that got rdna2 with rt mind?
Its not feature on rx6.
pleanty of people and it is a feature.
Undying:
It would be more compelling option as both 3060ti and 3070 are limited by memory configurations. Superior rt but please reduce the texture quality. 😛
you're limited by vram on 3060ti at 1440p rt on in one-two games out of all,and that is at native only while you can and should use dlss.
you're limited by 6700xt weak rt in every instance you're running rt.
and if 3060ti is so limited,then explain this,20 games in 4 resolutions,including 3440x1440 and 4K.fantastic,that 80eur msrp and +200eur actual retail price premium really was worth 0.8%
this is as silly as your "580 8g can beat every 6g nvidia card" argument so please stop talking nonsense again,I thought you're done with it but cleraly not.it's actually dead last.
it was only reported faster by HUB is a rushed benchmark since they knew gameready drivers were gonna put nvidia on top (check it out,there is no mention whatsoeverr what driver they are using for the "test")
https://www.purepc.pl/battlefield-2042-pc-sprawdzamy-wymagania-sprzetowe-test-wydajnosci-kart-graficznych-nvidia-geforce-i-amd-radeon?page=0,7
it's pretty pathetic that amd fans can call me out on "trolling" when I'm the only one to find data on the topics we're discussing.I am truly sorry that you're stuck with 580 and refuse to buy nvidia while amd rx6000 is awol at the moment but that is no excuse to make up imaginary reasons not to.
pleanty of people and it is a feature.
you're limited by vram on 3060ti at 1440p rt on in one-two games out of all,and that is at native only while you can and should use dlss.
you're limited by 6700xt weak rt in every instance you're running rt.
and if 3060ti is so limited,then explain this,20 games in 4 resolutions,including 3440x1440 and 4K.fantastic,that 80eur msrp and +200eur actual retail price premium really was worth 0.8%
this is as silly as your "580 8g can beat every 6g nvidia card" argument so please stop talking nonsense again,I thought you're done with it but cleraly not.it's actually dead last
https://www.purepc.pl/battlefield-2042-pc-sprawdzamy-wymagania-sprzetowe-test-wydajnosci-kart-graficznych-nvidia-geforce-i-amd-radeon?page=0,7
it's pretty pathetic that amd fans can call me out on "trolling" when I'm the only one to find data on the topics we're discussing.I am truly sorry that you're stuck with 580 and refuse to buy nvidia while amd rx6000 is awol at the moment but that is no excuse to make up imaginary reasons not to.
You are repeating the data thats going into your favor trying to defend your own purchase and everything nvidia has to offer. Im sorry but thats trolling. There is more than a two games limited by 8gb vram at 1440p and its gonna be more. Superior rt isnt going to help there. Even a midrange intel arch gpus will have 12-16gb early next year so yeah, 3060ti/3070 absolete already.
6700xt all the way over 3060ti but its a shame it costs 950eur. Thats the reason im stuck with what i have. 😛
You are repeating the data thats going into your favor trying to defend your own purchase and everything nvidia has to offer. Im sorry but thats trolling. There is more than a two games limited by 8gb vram at 1440p and its gonna be more. Superior rt isnt going to help there. Even a midrange intel arch gpus will have 12-16gb early next year so yeah, 3060ti/3070 absolete already.
6700xt all the way over 3060ti but its a shame it costs 950eur. Thats the reason im stuck with what i have. 😛
Showing data is trolling,lol We're done discussing it i suppose.
6700xt is 1-3% faster in non rt,30% slower in rt,lacks dlss and dlaa and more expensive too.
Showing data is trolling,lol We're done discussing it i suppose.
6700xt is 1-3% faster in non rt,30% slower in rt,lacks dlss and dlaa and more expensive too.
You only need dlss if you RT. Which rx6 doesn't support. Foools who fall for that marketing and pay 900e for card i don't feel bad for them. Even amd didn't push rt marketing . No sure how many people imagined they can run rt in AMD right now , if they did they are uninformed foools.
Rdna2 is top, best, if not the best raster gpu made till now. End of story. Beyond that is just wishing.
There is a reason Forza and BF 2042 had separate GPU vram requirements. AMD GPUs required more memory. This was an official thing.
All you AMD fans who are simply stating a vram number are ignoring more than they actually know. Its always been Nvidia has less vram, always. Its never been different. Not a single generation ever. Why?
Im still missing old times, where just Videocard memory could be expanded through optiomal memory slots.
I still dream about modular GPUs, where we would be able only replace main chip, memory..
Not possible with current level of technology. ie things are too advanced to allow this.
Traces need to be as short as possible and unbroken otherwise speed will have to be reduced.
It didnt matter so much in times past because the boundaries werent being pushed so hard, other things mattered more.
You only need dlss if you RT. Which rx6 doesn't support. Foools who fall for that marketing and pay 900e for card i don't feel bad for them. Even amd didn't push rt marketing . No sure how many people imagined they can run rt in AMD right now , if they did they are uninformed foools.
Rdna2 is top, best, if not the best raster gpu made till now. End of story. Beyond that is just wishing.
It's funny that when you say "the best raster GPU", you mean 1080p and 1440p, but not UW 1440p/4K, this is just copium at best and poor trolling attempt at worst.
There is a reason Forza and BF 2042 had separate GPU vram requirements. AMD GPUs required more memory. This was an official thing.
All you AMD fans who are simply stating a vram number are ignoring more than they actually know. Its always been Nvidia has less vram, always. Its never been different. Not a single generation ever. Why?
correct.
amd cards use about 0.5G more in 2042 and 1G in FH5.
and while 6700xt does provide 4G vram more,it not only doesn't beat 3070,it doesn't beat a 3060ti in non-rt.with rt on it's getting the same numbers as 2070 Super,which would be acceptable if it had a dlss equivalent available.
the only games that can't be run on 8G at 1440p are amd sponsored turds (technically speaking) like fc6 with a 50G texture mod on an ancient engine,with quarter res ray tracing that produces artifacts all across the landscape.meanwhile cp2077 doesn't even fill 8G with an open world and ray traced GI,shadows and reflections running.Not even MSFS requires more,with its huge map.
This has nothing to do wth actual facts,and more to do with Undying and Kapu trying to crap on anyone buying an ampere card since rx6000 launched. I hope they're getting paid at least,this is some devoted work for amd PR's department.
lower vram pool is certainly a disadvantage of rtx30 vs rx6000,but not really when it comes to 8G 256-bit at 1440p vs 6700xt 12g 192-bit,that has already been proved by a thousand reviews.same for 10G 320-bit 3080 at 4K vs 6800xt,and that is a bigger disadvantage than 8G at 1440p.6700xt would be a better choice if it delivered over 3060ti not only in vram buffer size,but it just doesn't.
Krizby:
It's funny that when you say "the best raster GPU", you mean 1080p and 1440p, but not UW 1440p/4K, this is just copium at best and poor trolling attempt at worst.
how ironic is it that he thinks people who bought amd's 600-700-1000eur cards are silly if they're trying to run them outside the scenario where radeons are faster than rtx30 cards.
It's funny that when you say "the best raster GPU", you mean 1080p and 1440p, but not UW 1440p/4K, this is just copium at best and poor trolling attempt at worst.
Yes 1080p and 1440p. I said in post above. This was the design.
4k is not terrible but memory bus isn't enough for it (and cache).
And running these carda im different scenario can result in misserable framerates.
Yes 1080p and 1440p. I said in post above. This was the design.
4k is not terrible but memory bus isn't enough for it (and cache).
And running these carda im different scenario can result in misserable framerates.
then what is your point exactly ?
are they extremely good or miserable ? make up your mind.
so it's extremely limited then ? and sports a huge price tag at the same time.
I wouldnt call running everything with good fps at 1440p extremely limited.
Price is out of space at best. Cant do anything about it. It's funny how 6800 is more expensive than 3070 right now. It doesn't make any Sense.
this is as silly as your "580 8g can beat every 6g nvidia card" argument so please stop talking nonsense again,I thought you're done with it but cleraly not.it's actually dead last. it was only reported faster by HUB is a rushed benchmark since they knew gameready drivers were gonna put nvidia on top (check it out,there is no mention whatsoeverr what driver they are using for the "test") https://www.purepc.pl/battlefield-2042-pc-sprawdzamy-wymagania-sprzetowe-test-wydajnosci-kart-graficznych-nvidia-geforce-i-amd-radeon?page=0,7 it's pretty pathetic that amd fans can call me out on "trolling" when I'm the only one to find data on the topics we're discussing.I am truly sorry that you're stuck with 580 and refuse to buy nvidia while amd rx6000 is awol at the moment but that is no excuse to make up imaginary reasons not to.