Leaked Benchmarks: GeForce RTX 3050 Defeats Radeon RX 6500 XT
Click here to post a comment for Leaked Benchmarks: GeForce RTX 3050 Defeats Radeon RX 6500 XT on our message forum
cucaulay malkin
everything defeats 6500xt
rx580 defeats 6500xt
that's not really news.
it's about 1660ti,sligthly slower so more like 1660S or 1070.
Kaarme
Nvidia did have a lowest acceptable standard when making a new gaming card. AMD did not. Fortunately for AMD, buyers don't have one, either.
LEEc337
It's a card for gamers... Not high end but adequate to play games well without being of interest to miners I like it
kapu
Man, what a sensation , it out-done HEFTY-BEEFY 6500XT.
It will be funny if it will have lower frape/$* ratio 😀 and i bet 10$ it will 😀
*PCIE 4.0
rl66
On other hand it was quite easy, even medium range from 3 gen ago does...
Also it doesn't make the 3050 good for that, i wait your review to have an idea 🙂
kanenas
Silva
Do we even need leaks for this? It was obvious.
mikeysg
I, and I'm pretty certain everyone here and in the various forums, have had this figured out already. It now boils down to price and availability.....forget the fake news that is MSRP.
cucaulay malkin
1660S is 30% faster
and 6500xt starts at 350eur (in Germany,cause in PL there are no 6500xt's)
so +455eur and they'll be the same at 4.0,if 3050 doesn't turn out to be faster than 1660S
tbh comparing it at 4.0 is kinda pointless.
out of all people that have it,who is really into buying a 6500xt
kapu
academically speaking cost per frame 6500XT PCIE 4.0 at market prices is a king right now , which is kind funny considering how bad it is 😀
cucaulay malkin
what ? no it isn't
we told you that the tpu chart you linked included 6500xt at msrp and others at market prices,like 400 for 1650 Super
kapu
What has better $/frame right now ? We are only counting :
1. New cards.
2. PCIE 4.0
3. 1080p
cucaulay malkin
6600xt
2x the performance
600eur vs 350eur
and anything else too, really
cucaulay malkin
6600
1.71x the performance
1.51x the price
even 3060ti at 800eur has the same perf/dollar at 1080p,and it's severly bottlenecked at this resolution
kapu
You are right , just checked.
cucaulay malkin
6700xt at 850 would match it also
2.4x the performance (two 6500xt's + 40% of one 6500xt's in one card)
and we're talking about cards with 8-12G vram that run 4K better than this runs 1080p
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-6500-xt-pulse/30.html
kapu
YEa the problem is 6500XT performance, it's just below its target market. It should be at least 20-30% faster than it is to make it appealing. That would require 128bit bus or 8 pcie lanes and more cores .
rflair
Moderator
Two piles of crap, one painted red the other green.
Alessio1989
They should not be sold over 125 bucks these pile of crap, considering performance and what was the prices 3 years ago of the cards they are replacing.
Venix
was there even a doubt ?
