Intel Core processor with 10.000 naming Shows up

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel Core processor with 10.000 naming Shows up on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
intel should hire the guys responsible for the usb naming after 3.0 ...they will make things super clear !
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
Undying:

Intel Core i9 10900k. This just sounds silly.
Here's the question, what will people call it? Ten Nine hundred ? Ten thousand Nine hundred? One O Nine Hundred? One Zero Nine Hundred? One hundred and nine zero zero? Ten-Series nine hundred? So many different ways, none of them good. If they plan to go to the 10 series they should have just called it a 19000k and then skipped to 29000k next generation. In all honesty, ten-series nine hundred sounds best though. for instance, people ask what you got in your PC all the time, i could see people saying "i7 10-series nine-ninety-k" for a i7 10990k(example)
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Aura89:

Here's the question, what will people call it? Ten Nine hundred ? Ten thousand Nine hundred? One O Nine Hundred? One Zero Nine Hundred? One hundred and nine zero zero? Ten-Series nine hundred? So many different ways, none of them good. If they plan to go to the 10 series they should have just called it a 19000k and then skipped to 29000k next generation. In all honesty, ten-series nine hundred sounds best though. for instance, people ask what you got in your PC all the time, i could see people saying "i7 10-series nine-ninety-k" for a i7 10990k(example)
Remember the transition from Pentium to core 2 duo/quad and then to i5/i7 name scheming? They need something like that, familiar but new.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/266/266726.jpg
Undying:

Remember the transition from Pentium to core 2 duo/quad and then to i5/i7 name scheming? They need something like that, familiar but new.
Something like core X would do nicely, But frankly something cheesy and or silly doesn't surprise me, given the brain drain that has happened at intel's marketing division over the years
data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp
Not a big deal, not like anyone is going to be buying Intel CPUs 2 months from now anyway
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189980.jpg
Intel can name their CPUs as they see fit, I'll have a Matisse build, no matter what.
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
AMD naming conventions are worse or crap too, their APUS and specially the GPUs.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273822.jpg
Undying:

Intel Core i9 10900k. This just sounds silly.
ten point nine k pretty straight forward.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
Mundosold:

Not a big deal, not like anyone is going to be buying Intel CPUs 2 months from now anyway
Er Um what? that would be a neat trick! ....just shut down the factory's.... we are done folks! Loooooool
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/261/261894.jpg
Man talk serious... intel is dead! I love my money and i wanna a cpu not a roaster
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
Borys:

Man talk serious... intel is dead!
seriously? I mean seriously dude! ....do you work for amd or something? no one I know here would ever make that statement.
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
CAn't wait to buy their next 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 8 core with a 100mhz bump up and having to literally use a minifridge sized phase change cooler to barely keep it operating in year 2021 AD. Yours for $900. Runs quake 3 Arena at 320x240 at 3% higher framerate than pathetic AMD RYZENFAIL. =Intel Domination=
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/234/234843.jpg
Doesn't exactly roll off the tongue but I can unsterstand their reluctance to rebrand.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/277/277395.jpg
They should make it like the Xeon lineups But like "Core xy00" series X denoting tier Y denoting generation 2000 series: celeron 3000 series: pentium 4000 series: i3 5000 series: i5 6000 series: i7 7000 series: i7X 8000 series: i9 9000 series: i9X Makes sense to me
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
Eulytaur:

They should make it like the Xeon lineups But like "Core xy00" series X denoting tier Y denoting generation 2000 series: celeron 3000 series: pentium 4000 series: i3 5000 series: i5 6000 series: i7 7000 series: i7X 8000 series: i9 9000 series: i9X Makes sense to me
This works for Xeons because companies purchasing Xeons know exactly what they are looking for. This would not work for consumers as all they really do is look at the first number and compare it to whatever they currently have. Obviously most people have no idea what that means, but if they have a 3400 processor, and the new computer they are looking at says 9100, that to them looks like a "big" change, even if it's really not. Whereas if they had a 3430 processor, and the new one has a 3930 processor, it doesn't look near as big of a change. Sure, still higher, but if you pitted two examples next to eachother, told them either the 3930, or the 9100, even if they were exactly, 100%, the same re-branded CPU, they'd pick the 9100, and probably spend more money to have it.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/261/261894.jpg
airbud7:

seriously? I mean seriously dude! ....do you work for amd or something? no one I know here would ever make that statement.
YES man! I talked very seriously! But you dont understand my real message... this Intel that all know is DEAD! They will must change everthing of their products and prices! Or you are a senior member like too many others here that build a high-end Intel PC to gain 5FPS on 1080p?!?!?!?! Come on... lets talk about market, money and performance... here is a place to learn what is the best option always looking to the investiment you will do. All smart people know that at 1440 and 4k there is no FPS gain through CPU... sorry but this is too ridiculus... until when the blue fanboys will talk of gamer performance at 1080p???
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/274/274779.jpg
It`s over 9000 but probably still 14nm.