Intel Core processor with 10.000 naming Shows up
Click here to post a comment for Intel Core processor with 10.000 naming Shows up on our message forum
emperorsfist
Well, this will be a bit of a headache if true...
nevcairiel
I don't see the big deal. After 9000 comes 10000. Easier to deal with a naming scheme we already know and mostly understand, then learn a new one.
anticupidon
Intel's naming scheme
https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/000/056/itsover1000.jpg
TheDeeGee
Not really... just Zen2.
slyphnier
which more confusing ?
10***-series or
X***-series (chipset been named with X*** and Z*** so this might cause even more confusing) or
A***-series (hex coding 0-9 a-f)... i personally kinda like it
for codename initial wont work, so many same intial name
cascade-lake, coffee-lake etc
what u guys idea for naming ?
but i guess human used to simple numbering for new-gen/product
we almost always interpret higher number = newer / better
looking for latest product, just find the product with highest number
FM57
From 286-386-486 to 10.000.
Getting old.
Undying
Intel Core i9 10900k.
This just sounds silly.
Texter
You mean the Ryzen 3000 lineup that's being powered by Zen 2 CPU's...o_O
Embra
Gives to more naming options?? It is already confusing to the average consumer as to with cpu to buy.
They should start over in the 100's .
Hyderz
Just make a new line up
i2 = Pentiums, Celeron
i4 = i3
i6 = i5
i8 = i7
i8x or i10 = i9
maybe 😛
H83
I will be waiting for the 16666K or 19999K...
airbud7
why not use the year it came out?...ie: i7-2019 - i9-2020 then add an X or K for the high end part.
and maybe an S for the slow ones.
Alessio1989
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/66106739.jpg
Silva
It would actually make sense if they used the number to refer to the number of cores:
i2 DualCore
i4 QuadCore
etc
Great idea, but not exciting for the marketing department.
rl66
Not for i2, because originaly i3 was meaning "I"ntel core"3", and so the i2 should be the core2 line.
i0 might be a bad idea too (even in " i0 gold KFC my dog's anniversary limited edition 🙂 " )
But i agree, 4 digits should be the limit of easy to read and remember....
nevcairiel
Years can end up equally confusing, especially since the entire lineup is not always being released at once. For example, the 9900K is clearly a 2018 CPU. But what about many of the other 9000 series, which were released in 2019? Are those 2019 CPUs? Or 2018? They are very closely related to the 9900K afterall, which is a 2018, just smaller.
Tieing yourself down to something like the year is not flexible enough for how hardware is being released. So either you follow it very strictly, and its confusing, or you relax it - and it ends up just like any other arbitrary number and loses much of its meaning.
schmidtbag
It's always been a headache, we've just had it for so long that we've grown numb to it.
Makes a lot of sense to me. Though I would adjust it like this:
i# yyccs
Where # is the performance tier, yy is the year, cc is the core count, and s is the X, K, U, etc suffix.
anticupidon
Enough numbers already.
Name it after their worth, demographic target audience and performance.
Nifty, Mighty and Epic. 🙄
Wait a minute, EPYC is already taken.
Intel's naming scheme is beyond salvation.
eddward
They could slice the last "0" and everything would be fine.
chispy
^^^ This 😀
