GeForce GTX 750 Ti "Maxwell" Performance Numbers Leak
Click here to post a comment for GeForce GTX 750 Ti "Maxwell" Performance Numbers Leak on our message forum
rflair
Moderator
Some Compute performance would be nice to see along with some GPU specs.
eXXon
The performance of the card, seems underwhelming if true.
Granted the drivers are unofficial, but I thought Maxwell would leap-frog Kepler in terms of performance while consuming less power.
Could official drivers increase performance by 30% over these rumored numbers? Doubt it.
V@IO
@ James Frazer, if you see a problem in an article report it politely, there is no need to be rude. Sometimes articles are posted, and edited afterwards 🙂
^ Never mind
FordLynx07
Where does it place the GTX650Ti Boost?
War child
I would love to see James Frazer trying to make the same report in Dutch and let us critique his attempt.
Looking at the performance, I find it hard to accept. I hope this introductory card is underperforming due to drivers. We have seen this in the past.
Regardless of 750 Ti performance, I always get excited when new architecture hits the market.
Memorian
Pretty weak card but it's just a GM107.
-Tj-
^
Yeah.. Should be ok for a physx gpu, that's if you have your main gpu that's a little weak.
k1net1cs
Just a heads-up: the 'removed' comment posts are still visible on the article.
chasus
As long as this 'GTX 750Ti' performs lower than a GTX760, then there is no conflict. Direct comparison between two series might not be possible sometimes. And, perhaps, there will be a GTX750 Ultra to sit between this 750Ti and a 760?
Gembel
http://hothardware.com/News/NVIDIA-Exposes-GPU-Roadmap-Kepler-Arrives-2011-Maxwell-in-2013/
I thought maxwell will have 3 times more horse power over keppler
eclap
Undying
Denial
anub1s18
nvidia wouldn't let the 750ti cannibalize the 760 sales by having it be faster, though i'd think it's odd that it doesn't beat the 660 perhaps with final drivers.
and it doesn't show the power consumption, Maxwell is supposed to deliver more power per watt then Kepler and that's what i'm mainly interested in.
looking for a intermediate card till the 8 series arrives since my 470 is getting it's ass handed to it left and right by my modded skyrim and some of the more resent games (though the vram is what seems to be cripling me the most.
i'd wait for final review to see what's actually used and what it's capable of (oc).
could be a lot of disabled clusters or perhaps none who knows.
toniglandyl
we don't know anything about this card, so the performance numbers are irrelevant. it could be Nvidia's cheap, cool and efficient low profile and single slot card to fit the trend of low profile PCs.
I mean, if this card is priced right, it could be interesting for a lot of budget players who want to benefit from the latest stuff (shadowplay and all)
Undying
Considering GTX660/ti or even 270x can be found for 170-180€ it really need to priced lower, but knowing nvidia that may not be the case.
Time will tell...
---TK---
Nvidia is releasing low end first it seems. They don't have to lower prices on gk104 gk110 releasing this stuff.
Fender178
I didn't expect that the 750ti would be slower than a 660 even with updated drivers. Man maybe Nividia will add some tweak the card some what to make it faster than the 660.
Denial
oOEvil1Oo
If they release a card like this that is a beast compared to a 660, or above it really would hurt their sales. This is going to be a low end next gen GPU. We have no idea about power, heat or anything with these yet, and with them releasing low end 1st, they would butcher future sales of 760 and up cards. Just my $.02