Download: GeForce Hotfix Driver Version 436.51

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Download: GeForce Hotfix Driver Version 436.51 on our message forum
#5717530
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
jwb1:

Looks like the Edge when playing a video crash is back in this.
which edge?
#5717549
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
Screw this, I'm going back to 436.15
#5717624
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/222/222821.jpg
kurtextrem:

You tell me to get a grip and start insulting, even though I did not include a single judging word apart from "again". Did I say it's negative, positive, did I even state anything? No, I did not. I just told the facts. That doesn't change that WHQL drivers currently feel like beta drivers and the hot fixes afterwards are the ones you wanna use.
every released driver must be whql certified, because without you cant install it the normal way anymore. so every hotfix/beta one has whql...
#5717659
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/49/49225.jpg
Recently formatted my computer, have only installed this driver, but I get stutter at random times in games, no matter if its a graphics intensive game or not. I have 2 1080 tis, even with sli disabled I get the same result. I never had this issue before I formatted. Could it be this driver or something else?
#5717664
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
It's time to upgrade my PC. I wanted to buy 1660, but Nvidia does everything so that I no longer get in touch with them, as AMD once did. Everything was fine until the driver update 420... I rolled back to the old 387 driver, GTA broke down last week, I decided to upgrade to 436, even YouTube stopped working for me ... I rolled back to 431, but the miracle did not happen. Then I downloaded this fix 436.51 and again failed. Now I am installing 387 again. It seems that Nvidia began to smell bad.
#5717679
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254926.jpg
flatfx:

It's time to upgrade my PC. I wanted to buy 1660, but Nvidia does everything so that I no longer get in touch with them, as AMD once did. Everything was fine until the driver update 420... I rolled back to the old 387 driver, GTA broke down last week, I decided to upgrade to 436, even YouTube stopped working for me ... I rolled back to 431, but the miracle did not happen. Then I downloaded this fix 436.51 and again failed. Now I am installing 387 again. It seems that Nvidia began to smell bad.
[youtube=glitECNXixU]
#5717717
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
flatfx:

It's time to upgrade my PC. I wanted to buy 1660, but Nvidia does everything so that I no longer get in touch with them, as AMD once did. Everything was fine until the driver update 420... I rolled back to the old 387 driver, GTA broke down last week, I decided to upgrade to 436, even YouTube stopped working for me ... I rolled back to 431, but the miracle did not happen. Then I downloaded this fix 436.51 and again failed. Now I am installing 387 again. It seems that Nvidia began to smell bad.
700 series owners should not install higher than 399.24, 600 series owners can, but for some reason for 700 cards, it all goes to shit. Probably Boost 2.0 specific.
#5717730
data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp
Astyanax:

700 series owners should not install higher than 399.24, 600 series owners can, but for some reason for 700 cards, it all goes to crap. Probably Boost 2.0 specific.
Seems right. For my MSI GTX760 Gaming best driver is 387.92. But I see on the Nvidia support forum a lot of messages about the failures of different video cards. I'm really disappointed. I almost bought a GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X.
#5717737
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72794.jpg
Any reason for non-turing users to update from the golden 431.70 if I don't have any issues or play any of the games that have had fixes for? Basically is there finally better performance or still the same or slightly worse? Asking for Paxwell and Maxwell. I have decided to only update to really solid drivers as I don't play as much anymore and I am off the upgrade every driver release train. I am on the tried, tested, and true method of solid drivers less often train 🙂 Thanks.
#5717783
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/265/265648.jpg
Mott:

Any reason for non-turing users to update from the golden 431.70 if I don't have any issues or play any of the games that have had fixes for? Basically is there finally better performance or still the same or slightly worse? Asking for Paxwell and Maxwell. I have decided to only update to really solid drivers as I don't play as much anymore and I am off the upgrade every driver release train. I am on the tried, tested, and true method of solid drivers less often train 🙂 Thanks.
side note, for non turing users the 431.86 is the golden, its the 431.70 with a few fixes. ALL the drivers since the 431.86 have SUCKED for my Volta (Titan V) and Titan XP buids -with empasis on major suckage from the 436.xx for not turing. ps the 431.86 added 24 bit, 30 bit, and 64 bit colour. HOWEVER, I'm not sure if that applies to non volta
#5717787
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
it applies to all supported cards.
#5717794
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72794.jpg
venturi:

side note, for non turing users the 431.86 is the golden, its the 431.70 with a few fixes. ALL the drivers since the 431.86 have SUCKED for my Volta (Titan V) and Titan XP buids -with empasis on major suckage from the 436.xx for not turing. ps the 431.86 added 24 bit, 30 bit, and 64 bit colour. HOWEVER, I'm not sure if that applies to non volta
Thanks dude! Will try. I have bee using the 431.70 drivers as they are studio certified which usually counts for something unlike WHQL, Game Ready, or whatever meaningless label they like to give their drivers these days.
#5717883
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
swbf2 continues to randomly crash to desktop (at the menu essentially) with this driver :/ (tested with 1080 Ti and 2080 Ti on two differents computers under windows 10 uptodate) and ground texture on Kassshyk are still broken in dx12 mode :/
#5717921
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/222/222136.jpg
Where's the GTA V fix ffs.
#5718317
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235151.jpg
Getting artifacts whit these in GRID 2019 Some Rocks textures not loading and a lot of ghosting behind the cars when racing!
#5718348
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/108/108341.jpg
nick0323:

Where's the GTA V fix ffs.
I was wondering as well, but from what I've read it seems like it is the fault of Rockstar and their launcher. We shall see...
Elajitz:

Getting artifacts whit these in GRID 2019 Some Rocks textures not loading and a lot of ghosting behind the cars when racing!
Same here, as well as some flat red boxes instead of textures. Also several cars would have white lights when I looked backwards, when they should clearly have yellow headlights.
#5719192
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/222/222136.jpg
BuildeR2:

I was wondering as well, but from what I've read it seems like it is the fault of Rockstar and their launcher. We shall see... Same here, as well as some flat red boxes instead of textures. Also several cars would have white lights when I looked backwards, when they should clearly have yellow headlights.
Not a fan of the launcher so far and I kinda gathered it would be related to that. I had to repair my install of GTA V after migration to the launcher as it was missing about 5GB of game files. Also it doesn't pick up my copy of GTA IV on Steam.
#5719200
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
its not the launcher, the launcher isn't even active once the game starts. My install of the launcher detected by gtav steam install though
#5719210
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
I've tried to play GTA V it's nausea inducing to me for some reason driving and know it's related to some weird rendering delay, image blurring technique and compared to other titles with similar graphics, the performance is awful.

Previous Page

Next Page