Download: GeForce 411.63 WHQL drivers

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Download: GeForce 411.63 WHQL drivers on our message forum
#5586685
data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp
dr_rus:

They are not slower, the average difference with 399.xx is well below margin of error.
:D:D:D:D:D again your margin of error, and again to low
#5586686
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
Probably gonna skip these. And although it may not be related to the power monitoring bug but I do wonder if I finally stop getting BSODs with GPU-Z running now that this bug is fixed...
#5586689
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/215/215952.jpg
artina90:

I look forward to trying these once the crap free version is ready @cryohellinc I had some random crashes in Planet Alpha with the Battlefield V Drivers, hopefully these help with stability.
Just do it yourself, its not really that hard. 😉 Theres a nice and easy tutorial by him in the regarding thread.
#5586690
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231812.jpg
So nothing to gain from installing on a GTX 1080? Should I stick with the 399.24?
#5586692
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
Mustang104:

So nothing to gain from installing on a GTX 1080? Should I stick with the 399.24?
a little worse
#5586697
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174022.jpg
squalles:

a little worse
No. Again, based even on the CB.de data alone, they are not "a little worse". https://i.picpar.com/NYUc.png 399.07 average is 57,78 411.51 average is 57,90 This result is well within that margin of error which some people seem to be incapable of understanding.
#5586701
data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp
dr_rus:

No. Again, based even on the CB.de data alone, they are not "a little worse".
yeah... your "margin of error" again to low or be worst in more games 🙄:D:D:D:D
#5586707
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
ATAA?
dr_rus:

No. Again, based even on the CB.de data alone, they are not "a little worse". https://i.picpar.com/NYUc.png 399.07 average is 57,78 411.51 average is 57,90 This result is well within that margin of error which some people seem to be incapable of understanding.
all people see if lost in fps this margin of error imo it just something for people to go on about
#5586711
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174022.jpg
tsunami231:

all people see if lost in fps this margin of error imo it just something for people to go on about
The funny part is that there's no loss in fps at all.
#5586716
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
Fixed: "Monster Hunter : Low Frame Rate in Game" What exactly was wrong here? Anyone tested?
#5586717
data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp
hey u noticed that on that test version is 411.51 and now is .63?
#5586718
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231812.jpg
OK thanks guys I have nothing better to do this evening so I have these installed now, see how they go.
#5586721
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174022.jpg
spidermind79:

hey u noticed that on that test version is 411.51 and now is .63?
Oh yeah, this must mean that they are totally slower than 399 or even .51. I mean, like 0,03% slower!
#5586722
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
spidermind79:

hey u noticed that on that test version is 411.51 and now is .63?
true... like 399.07 and not 399.24 too
#5586724
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
dr_rus:

No. Again, based even on the CB.de data alone, they are not "a little worse". https://i.picpar.com/NYUc.png 399.07 average is 57,78 411.51 average is 57,90 This result is well within that margin of error which some people seem to be incapable of understanding.
dr_rus:

The funny part is that there's no loss in fps at all.
it funny it almost funny as people that go "i lost 100 point in this benchmark!" people just looking for something to pick at
#5586729
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/215/215952.jpg
Low frame rate in MHW wasnt even an open issue? Hmm. I tested town (before 46, now 63), forest (40ish before, now 50-60) and dessert (40ish before now almost 70, depends ofc) and i can say, i gained 15-20fps (fastsync), just lol... I also tested some Metro 2033 redux (1440p, maxed out, except 0,5x SSAA, fastsync), im monitoring the fps myself and i think i got more fps now. Im still playing tho..
#5586730
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
dr_rus:

Oh yeah, this must mean that they are totally slower than 399 or even .51. I mean, like 0,03% slower!
I meaning that it's useless to discuss about that article for me
#5586732
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
The question is will these drivers deduce the price
#5586733
data/avatar/default/avatar28.webp
ShadowDuke:

Low frame rate in MHW wasnt even an open issue? Hmm. I tested town (before 46, now 63), forest (40ish before, now 50-60) and dessert (40ish before now almost 70, depends ofc) and i can say, i gained 15-20fps (fastsync), just lol...
The Fuck? That sounds impressive. Will try it out.
#5586736
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174022.jpg
ShadowDuke:

Low frame rate in MHW wasnt even an open issue?
Likely something they've run into during Turing prelaunch testing and fixed it right away, without even adding it to issues.

Previous Page

Next Page