AMD's Ryzen 7 1700X Caught on Camera and some Benchies

#5396112

Aura89

2017-02-22 03:31

So, they have that many more pins in basically the same area, AND they have an empty space in the middle? Sheesh.

#5396115

HeavyHemi

2017-02-22 03:36

Where's Marty and Doc? The date on the 3Dmark run is days into the future!:) Anyhow, I'll throw this out there as a comparison with my 6850K @4.5 specs listed Physics Score 20111 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11057804

#5396124

marian4q

2017-02-22 04:24

"Tomorrow I'll have some new stuff to report with new videos from our side as well" It's happening!!! 🙂

#5396130

HeavyHemi

2017-02-22 04:41

I'm guessing your 6850K is overclocked. Would be interesting to see how the 1700X performs overclocked, with fast, known memory, and tweaked, considering the price difference.

Yes, that why it says 4.5 ghz so, nobody would have to guess. 🙂 The Ryzen chip was shown with a 39 multi. So, it is possible to extrapolate relative performance.

#5396149

Elder III

2017-02-22 05:42

May I interpret this as HH having some Ryzen chip(s) in the house that we will be teased with tomorrow? 😀

#5396151

HeavyHemi

2017-02-22 06:00

May I interpret this as HH having some Ryzen chip(s) in the house that we will be teased with tomorrow? 😀

Sorry, but I cannot reveal that information.... Oh...that HH...my bad...

#5396157

brutlern

2017-02-22 06:48

"Tomorrow I'll have some new stuff to report with new videos from our side as well." The NDA lasts until feb 28, so... are you sure about tomorrow?

#5396160

Elder III

2017-02-22 07:08

Sorry, but I cannot reveal that information.... Oh...that HH...my bad...

Sorry man, I was thinking of the Dutch HH and not the Hemi.... although I wouldn't mind one of these in my driveway. 😉 http://www.speednik.com/files/2014/01/twice_blown.jpg

#5396162

Ryu5uzaku

2017-02-22 07:15

Yes, that why it says 4.5 ghz so, nobody would have to guess. 🙂 The Ryzen chip was shown with a 39 multi. So, it is possible to extrapolate relative performance.

It can do from what I know 3.5 all core turbo.

#5396163

HeavyHemi

2017-02-22 07:22

Sorry man, I was thinking of the Dutch HH and not the Hemi.... although I wouldn't mind one of these in my driveway. 😉 http://www.speednik.com/files/2014/01/twice_blown.jpg

Nooo...just.... :banana::banana::banana::https://cdn1.mecum.com/auctions/ca0815/ca0815-225244/images/ca0815-225244_1.jpg:banana::banana::banana:

#5396185

AlmondMan

2017-02-22 09:32

"Tomorrow I'll have some new stuff to report with new videos from our side as well." The NDA lasts until feb 28, so... are you sure about tomorrow?

Probably allowed to post some sort of hype video, like a video of the CPU in a running system. That's not been uncommon in the past.

Why did you overclock it? Make another test and leave it at stock speeds-turbo.

Because it's his daily use system and he didn't want to spend time clocking it down for the sake of one test? 😛

#5396211

BigMaMaInHouse

2017-02-22 10:41

Have you thought about having the 1700 on laptop? its 65W and already 7700K laptops available.

#5396214

Evildead666

2017-02-22 10:46

I'm not very knowledgable with DDR4, but those timings look very very loose for that speed. Does anyone here run DDR4, and at what timings/speed ?

#5396231

malitze

2017-02-22 11:25

I'm not very knowledgable with DDR4, but those timings look very very loose for that speed. Does anyone here run DDR4, and at what timings/speed ?

Yeah memory speed / timings are rather bad, for reference see http://www.anandtech.com/show/8959/ddr4-haswell-e-scaling-review-2133-to-3200-with-gskill-corsair-adata-and-crucial/2 http://images.anandtech.com/doci/8959/10%20-%20Performance%20Index_575px.png

#5396233

Turanis

2017-02-22 11:35

not too bad, let's see if games pick up multicore and how well it does then.

Depends what games. Few games from 2014-2016 will use more than 4 cores (no threads). And depends on what site are tested,e.g. Anandtech is based & biased on Intel dark side. Depends how much Intel will pay some sites to not allow good results from Ryzen. 😉

#5396246

Lane

2017-02-22 11:57

It can do from what I know 3.5 all core turbo.

Stock ? because it was allready confirmed by CanardPC that they was no problem with 4ghz on all cores on ES samples ( not a max oc ).

@ace66692 @Dresdenboy @Cat_Merc With MT apps, yes! Latest samples OC'ed @ 4 GHz (All cores + HT) are even not that far from the 6950X (10C). https://twitter.com/CPCHardware/status/817130693759303680

#5396248

Humanoid_1

2017-02-22 12:02

Have you thought about having the 1700 on laptop? its 65W and already 7700K laptops available.

Waiting for just that myself + been persuading friends to put off buying too until these arrive in their various flavours. Can't wait !!! :banana: EDIT: Going to feel weird having a laptop that is faster than my main system :3eyes:

#5396252

alanm

2017-02-22 12:12

And depends on what site are tested,e.g. Anandtech is based & biased on Intel dark side. Depends how much Intel will pay some sites to not allow good results from Ryzen. 😉

Of course! https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f3/Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg

#5396257

Turanis

2017-02-22 12:19

Well,boy,that escalated quickly. 🙂 Looks like Ryzen will support 3200+ DDR4.Maybe 4000+ in ze future.

#5396290

Amx85

2017-02-22 13:12

on Cinebenchs IPC seens over haswell refresh on monothreaded xD Zen´s rocks!