AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
Click here to post a comment for AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review on our message forum
Richard Nutman
I wonder if any or many games studios use Intel's compiler to build? It has been shown to disable optimal code paths at runtime if it detects it's not an Intel cpu.
It's just strange how the Zen 2 often beats Intel considerably in single threaded and multi-threaded tests, but when it comes to games, Intel still just has a slight edge. An edge that I don't think is worth caring about, but still.
schmidtbag
MonstroMart
Considering the next gen consoles coming out in 2020 are rumored to have 8 core and 16 threads cpu i'm not sure i would recommend anything lower than that if someone intend to keep his cpu for 6-7 years. The 7600k looked good when it was released but latest revisits of the cpu show that it is struggling to maintain an "acceptable" low 1% fps in some newer titles because it is limited to 4 threads. There's a couple of threads on BF V forum with 7600k owners complaining about performance.
6/12 and 8/8 will likely be enough moving forward but devs often lazily optimize for consoles only and not sure i would be confident with anything less than 8/16 since this is what next gen consoles will likely have and considering how weak they are devs will have to use those threads to push them to their limit toward the end of the generation. Current consoles have 8/8 cpu and some newer titles seem to be optimized for 8 threads.
MonstroMart
JamesSneed
Toadstool
The 3800x is more interesting than I thought I'd be. It's still pretty much a stopgap between the 3700x and 3900x but the bump over the 3700x is more than I thought it'd be, still maybe not as good bang for your buck as the 3700x but interesting none the less.
Also, karma777police never disappoints.
schmidtbag
MonstroMart
alanm
So about +10% base clock vs 3700x yet most of the benches are only about 2-3% diff. I know bin milking is a common practice, but would have expected better results tbh.
Rich_Guy
nizzen
My 3900x is pretty good @ gaming now after "tweaking" π
https://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_08_2019/post-42975-0-59794300-1565977580_thumb.png
https://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_08_2019/post-42975-0-04281500-1565977874_thumb.png
9900k is still better in gaming, but who cares π
NCC1701D
Arbie
"Overclocking is the weak spot for Ryzen."
Why do you keep saying this?
β’ It begs the question that manual OC is even desirable.
β’ It ignores the fact that Ryzen "overclocks" itself just fine.
β’ It makes a strength appear to be a weakness.
People will read this one sentence and conclude that Ryzen is seriously lacking. All the words after that won't matter.
Agonist
I still sew moronic fanboyism runs amuck with Intel shills.
Evildead666
Global unlimited
H83
Very nice CPU but i think the 3700x is a better buy over this one.
I donΒ΄t think anyone can spot that type of differences but the good thing of having an higher FPS than needed is that it compensantes frame drops much better. For example if we have a game running between 80/90 frames and something more taxing happens suddenly, the frame rate can drop bellow the 60 mark and you are going to notice it. But if the game game is running at more than 120 FPS and the same taxing stuff happens, the frame rate will probably drop to the 80/90 mark and we are not going to notice it.
So more more is better unless iΒ΄m mistaken...
Great review as always!
Rich_Guy
Pictus
One thing is for sure, current AMD cpus are safer than current Intel cpus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transient_execution_CPU_vulnerabilities
https://i.imgur.com/f23ljdp.png
Global unlimited