AMD Posts More RX 6900 XT and RX 6800 XT Benchmarks Tested on Ryzen 9 5900X

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD Posts More RX 6900 XT and RX 6800 XT Benchmarks Tested on Ryzen 9 5900X on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/267/267153.jpg
Wow, 6800 non XT beating 3090 in Battlefield 5 1440p... thats the slowest AMD card beating the fastest nVidia card right there.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
These AMD's own measuments were interesting to see as a part of the product reveal presentation, but now they are somewhat meaningless. What we need are reputable third party reviews, such as Guru3D's. It doesn't matter how much AMD advertises its own products. But then again, after so many years of not being able to compete for real, I guess it's understandable.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180081.jpg
Looking forward to a review of all these 🙂 looks good so far.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250418.jpg
That Battlefield V graph at 1440p though! Prices are not what I expect to see, but its all still early and I understand AMD needs the money to keep going. Hopefully these cards are available so people can buy them.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/263/263435.jpg
I really dont care about this, i wanne see real-time performance in games, and RT performance, when Hilbert Hagedoorn we see first reviews ?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243189.jpg
Would love to see a smart access memory on and off benchmark when the cards come out to see the performance benefit it generates in benchmarks.
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
moo100times:

Would love to see a smart access memory on and off benchmark when the cards come out to see the performance benefit it generates in benchmarks.
this. Every benchmark here is reported with Smart Memory Access on, but we don't know how much of an improvement is. Since many people is going to use a 6800/6800XT on an already existing platform (like my 3900X) I'd like to know how it will compare to Nvidia solutions.
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
moo100times:

Would love to see a smart access memory on and off benchmark when the cards come out to see the performance benefit it generates in benchmarks.
Considering that a very few of us have a 500 series board and going to ryzen 5xxx, I think your point is quite important for a vast majority of users.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
craycray:

Considering that a very few of us have a 500 series board and going to ryzen 5xxx, I think your point is quite important for a vast majority of users.
Minus 5-13% so the cards are close to the competing products. AMD already showed how much it can improve
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
Silva:

That Battlefield V graph at 1440p though! Prices are not what I expect to see, but its all still early and I understand AMD needs the money to keep going. Hopefully these cards are available so people can buy them.
AMD has always had an edge in Battlefield V.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/108/108420.jpg
Those bars represent frames per dollar! o_O Wake up people. And if it's true to form like the last benchmarks, that won't be average FPS, but 'maximum' FPS. AMD are doing a classic AMD, over hyping their products. 🙄
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/181/181421.jpg
What is cool in this AMD comparaison page (https://www.amd.com/en/gaming/graphics-gaming-benchmarks) is that you have the perf/$ of each card. If it can be trusted, the RTX3070 and the 6800XT are the "best" cards for their price. Indeed, the RTX3900 and the 6900Xt are way overpriced, and that shows here.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/281/281256.jpg
spine:

Those bars represent frames per dollar! o_O Wake up people. And if it's true to form like the last benchmarks, that won't be average FPS, but 'maximum' FPS. AMD are doing a classic AMD, over hyping their products. 🙄
Troll Alert? Lets wait and see but on the surface it looks like AMD has pretty much done an Intel on Nvidia and we have not seen the best yet am told by a friend in China
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
The numbers from AMD seem too good to be true but who knows... What´s the day of the review?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282600.jpg
Ryu5uzaku:

Minus 5-13% so the cards are close to the competing products. AMD already showed how much it can improve
You can tell by how much the 6800 out performs the 2080ti, in reality its the same as the 3070 so much slower in those graphs if you don't also have the cpu and mobo. I don't mind buying the whole platform though as I need a whole new pc so it could be a big selling point, even more so for system builders looking to get higher FPS charts for their PC's at lower prices than the competition who don't use it
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Kaarme:

These AMD's own measuments were interesting to see as a part of the product reveal presentation, but now they are somewhat meaningless. What we need are reputable third party reviews, such as Guru3D's. It doesn't matter how much AMD advertises its own products. But then again, after so many years of not being able to compete for real, I guess it's understandable.
You are absolutely right, but I think it's a good sign that a company is confident enough to show charts where its own product is slower than the competition (Intel vs. AMD in Battlefield V, 6800 XT vs. 3080 in Division 2, Resident Evil 3 or Wolfenstein: Youngblood).
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
ACEB:

You can tell by how much the 6800 out performs the 2080ti, in reality its the same as the 3070 so much slower in those graphs if you don't also have the cpu and mobo. I don't mind buying the whole platform though as I need a whole new pc so it could be a big selling point, even more so for system builders looking to get higher FPS charts for their PC's at lower prices than the competition who don't use it
But then again perf difference between 3070 and 2080ti on avg is 1%. So all in all the 6800 will end up faster anyway as it's leading by some 20% at points.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/93/93080.jpg
Man this is the first time ever in graphics card history I was excited to buy an ATI or AMD product FIRST at a launch. Well first for everything! 6800 XT and 6900 XT look sweet!
data/avatar/default/avatar31.webp
Witcher29:

I really dont care about this, i wanne see real-time performance in games, and RT performance, when Hilbert Hagedoorn we see first reviews ?
Wait for independent reviews then? /shrug. But if you enjoy leaving "I really don't care about this- {insert stuff}" and injecting your attitude immediately as though you were someone of status.... By all means your highness? 😕
data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp
moo100times:

Would love to see a smart access memory on and off benchmark when the cards come out to see the performance benefit it generates in benchmarks.
+1 and for use folks on older systems (none of the *lakes or AMD Ryzen), it would be a great incentive to go full AMD if the performance are really there. I can see at least 5600 + 6800XT making a great gaming system already. If the budget can squeeze it, definitely will consider 5800 or XT + 6800XT.