New Vega 10 687F:C1 3DMark Fire Strike Performance Result Spotted
Last week a 3Dmark Time Spy result set and Vega details have already seen and detected by one of our forum member, this weeks startes with a FireStike P score result set. Again with a Vega at a 1200 MHz GPU clock and 700 MHz HBM2 VRAM clock.
The Radeon RX Vega card tested was tagged with ID 687F:C1 and shows a graphics score of 17801. Specs for Vega include 64 CUs x 64 shader units = 4096 shader processors. These are divided over four blocks. There is a total of 64 ROP units (16 per block) and the GPu is to get 256 Texture memory units. If you compare it, that pretty much twice a Radeon RX 570. The architecture details actually also show a lot of similarities with Fiji (Radeon R9 Fury (X)). Vega 10 in its simplest model is expected to battle the GeForce GTX 1070 and 1080.
As it turns out, AMD could be fabbing three models:
- BIG WC = 687F:C3
- BIG Air = 687F:C2
- 'Normal' VEGA = 687F:C1
The result set from the run below this is the 687F:C1 one. The specs listed in the 3DMark scores show a device ID that is similar to that of the earlier Vega 10 prototypes we have spotted. This unit has 8GB of video RAM running at 700MHz (HBM2) and the card’s GPU clock is a 'safe' 1200MHz. So from the looks of it, these might be results from that early engineering sample. I do expect that AMD would be able to reach a 1.5 GHz base clock on the final products. Below the new entry, I also added the Time Spy one.
Fallout: New Vegas - Lonesome Road DLC Trailer - 09/15/2011 09:05 AM
In Lonesome Road you are contacted by the original Courier Six, a man by the name of Ulysses who refused to deliver the Platinum Chip at the start of Fallout: New Vegas. Ulysses promises the answer as...
Fallout: New Vegas DLC Packs Detailed - 05/04/2011 09:03 AM
The Bethesda Blog now offers details on three upcoming DLC packs for Fallout: New Vegas, Obsidian's action/RPG sequel, saying all three will receive simultaneous releases for PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 for ...
Senior Member
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2009-04-27
So C3 is prolly gonna be watercooled and clocked way higher, but without any OC headroom.
Senior Member
Posts: 11484
Joined: 2012-07-20
basically the same score as a FuryX

how in the hell is this possible?
No.
It is not.
Now, as for those scores:
Firestrike -> Shown 1200/700MHz indeed looks very similar to my Fury X score 1050/500MHz. That points there is something else going on.
Timespy -> Shown 1600/1000MHz, and does nearly double to what my Fury X does. And that is believable considering changes in architecture.
1st result may be TDP limited test or something.
Edit: BTW... 2048bit HBM2 @700MHz = 4096bit HBM1 @350MHz in bandwidth... So, that's what's going on.
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 2017-04-07

Senior Member
Posts: 315
Joined: 2013-03-06
Firestrike seems to get 10% better score than FuryX with a 20% higher clock than FuryX. So clock v clock it seems to be slower.
Time Spy is 2x the score... clock v clock a 25% improvement over FuryX.
Guess we'll just have to wait for it to come out.
Senior Member
Posts: 315
Joined: 2013-03-06
basically the same score as a FuryX
how in the hell is this possible?