Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT GamingX 8GB review
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT EVO 8GB review
PowerColor Radeon RX 5500 XT Red Dragon 8GB review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming 8GB review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB review
Zotac Gaming GTX 1650 Super review
Radeon Adrenalin 2020 Edition Driver Overview
Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide
Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33

New Downloads
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 19.12.2 driver download
PCMark 10 Download v2.0.2153
GeForce 441.66 WHQL driver download
CPU-Z download v1.91
GPU-Z Download v2.28.0
3DMark Download v2.11.6846 + Port Royale
HWiNFO64 Download v6.20
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 19.12.1 driver download
Crystal DiskMark Download v7.0.0f
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download v2.1.0.1424


New Forum Topics
Intel CPUs: Ten-year plan to includes 1.4nm and a two-year cadence Are we ever going to get a new NVIDIA CONTROL PANEL ??? Devil May Cry V/RESIDENT EVIL 2 BIOHAZARD RE:2 brightness bug AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 19.12.2 driver download & discussion GeForce Graphics Drivers 441.66 WHQL - Download & Discussion Netflix's The Witcher final trailer Guru3D 2019 December 12th contest: Win an Aorus 360 Liquid Cooler Thermaltake Announces S500 Tempered Glass Snow Edition Case Gigabyte releases Radeon RX 5500 XT graphics cards ASRock Launches the Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC & RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC Graphics Cards




Guru3D.com » Review » Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review » Page 1

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review - Article - Guide - Review

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/04/2014 11:35 AM [ 4] 31 comment(s)

Tweet

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare VGA grapics performance

It is that time of the year again, we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the new Call of Duty Advanced Warfare. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is the debut mainline Call of Duty title from Sledgehammer Games. It will focus on a private military company (PMC) that has turned rogue, attacking the US government. Set some time in the future, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare will feature futuristic tech such as cloaked vehicles and special climbing gloves that will allow the player to climb vertical surfaces.

For today's article will benchmark Call of Duty Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where the latest graphics cards are being tested with the new Call of Duty.  As such we'll take the more popular and modern graphics cards today and have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view. The release of Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, just like Ghosts is weird, the fact that it is only 64-bit in fact eliminates a number of customers. A second requirement for the game is that you need to have at least 6 GB of memory. If you have 3 or 4 GB installed, the game will not startup. We actually monitored DDR3 RAM behavior in-game and the game does eat away just of 4 Gigs of memory if you apply heaps of image quality settings. The game engine itself is fairly equal to the prequel though and especially with all tricks and bells enabled, it does look okay  if your graphics card can manage it of course. However, no matter how we benchmark the results remain a little unreliable. One test run will result on 40 FPS, the second 36 FPS and another 33 FPS. Then another factor is a challenge as well, some levels average out at say 40 FPS, yet there are a handful of scenes (with helicopters and such) where the frame rate will crumble down. Now 80% of the game plays with good playable framerates, but a handful of levels will just stall any graphics card whatsoever.  These means that the results shown today are indicative, not a precise measurement by any standard. 

As such today we'll show you graphics cards tested on three resolutions, Full HD (1920x1080), WHQD (2560x1440) and Ultra HD (3840 pixels × 2160 lines) . 

 




8 pages 1 2 3 4 next »



Related Articles
Call of Duty: WW2: PC graphics analysis benchmark review
It's time to check out that PC release of Call of Duty: WW2 for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are bein...

Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark review
It's that time of the year, Call of Duty in it's Infinite Warfare glory has been released. We will look at the game in our geeky gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards ...

Call of Duty: Black Ops III PC graphics performance benchmark review
It is that time of the year again, we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Black Ops III. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the new t...

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review
It is that time of the year again, we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the ne...

© 2019