Page 7
Before we begin .. in case you wonder why so many comparisons to NVIDIA GeForce cards ? We are using a new test system and I did not have time to do a full Radeon test. We received the X1950 XTX two days prior to it's launch so it boils down to lack of time.
XHD Gaming
So before we dive into our regular review session with resolutions from 1024x768 up-to 1920x1200 I quickly wanted to show you some numbers at XHD resolutions (uber resolutions, Extreme HD).
Here are the scores for three popular games measured at 1600x1200, 1920x1200 and the one that rules them all on a 30" Dell screen which I guarantee is better than your girlfriend ... 2560x1600.
Now there's not much point to test at 2560x1600 as you can see. We really need to test this lovely graphics card in Crossfire soon ! But up-to 1920x1200 ... you are good to go even with 4xAA and 16xAF enabled and that by itself is quite an achievement with games like above. Absolutely terrific for a 399 EUR priced card !
Right, back to the more regular resolutions.
Serious Sam 2
March 2001, developer Croteam released the original Serious Sam for the PC and pretty much made other standard first person shooters look like they were in neutral. The game, along with its stand alone follow up The Second Encounter, had an impressive graphics engine, huge outdoor environments, some wacky weapons, a fun co-op mode, and most importantly some of the numerous and strangest enemies in FPS history. When players first saw the headless bomb filled suicide attacker charging at them full blast with a blood curdling scream, they knew that this game was something special.
Four and a half years later, Croteam's turn return to the plate with Serious Sam 2 and while it's basic gameplay hasn't changed it has enough new features to make it a fun and solid follow up to the original. The graphics are also greatly improved. Like the first, there is a story in Serious Sam 2 (there are even some extended cut scenes that pull the story forward) but you can pretty much ignore this aspect. It's all about "Serious" Sam Stone going from point A to point B and blowing up everything that gets in his way.
Constantly flaunting a huge draw distance, extensive foliage, many impressive lighting effects such as refraction and even HDR, plus more than solid framerates, the Serious Engine 2 looks like a real beast.
What are we looking for in gaming performance wise ? First off, obviously we tend to think that all games should be played at the best image quality (IQ) possible. There's a dilemma though, IQ often interferes with the performance of a graphics card. We measure this in FPS, the number of frames a graphics card can render per second, the higher it is the more fluently your game will display itself.
A game's frames per second (FPS) is a measured average of a series of tests. That test often is a timedemo, a recorded part of the game which is a 1:1 representation of the actual game(play). After forcing the same image quality settings this timedemo is then used for all graphics cards so that the actual measuring is as objective as can be.
If a card can only manage less than 30 FPS then the game is barely playable.
With 30 FPS up-to roughly 40 FPS you'll be very able to play the game with perhaps a tiny stutter at certain graphically intensive parts.
When a graphics card is doing 60 FPS on average or higher then you can rest assured that the game will likely play extremely smoothly at every point in the game.
In the above chart you can see the results with HDR enabled and 16 levels of anisotropic filtering enabled. This actually is my preferred personal IQ setting for pretty much all games.
The Radeon X1950 XTX perform really well here. It's even close to the two hundred bucks more expensive 7950 GX2.
