Albatron Medusa GeForce4 Ti 4800SE

Graphics cards 1049 Page 11 of 20 Published by

teaser

Performance - Doom III Alpha

imageview.php?image=165A while ago something interesting happened. At last years E3 ID Software showed of DOOM III. Somehow that demo got leaked on to the internet. Virtually anyone with a good broadband connection was able to grab it. The breathtaking realism of the Doom III engine basically depend on two features; a realistic physics engine, and a unified lighting scheme that incorporates detailed bump-mapping and volumetric shadows. Hardware 'younger' than GeForce3 simply lack the flexibility and power to run Doom III with detailed features at an acceptable frame-rate. The engine is once again written in OpenGL.

The fortunate fact is that this game is completely stressing any graphics card to date. The downside .. it is still an Alpha release. The game is not optimized very well in this Alpha build and produces very low scores even in a resolution of 800x600. Still it is very interesting to see how well new graphics cards behave with this software and therefore we decided to start using it. Please let me state though, the framerates and image quality you are seeing do not represent the end product that Doom III will become ! Here's a new performance concept you might need to get used to, 1600x1200 at 80fps ... you can forget it!

This is the second time we actually have started using this benchmark so forgive us for the lack of comparative material. We just wanted to show you how it's handling this upcoming game.

Doom III

800x600

1024x768

1280x1024

1600x1200

Albatron Ti 4800 SE

14

9

6

4

Albatron Ti 4800 SE 3000+

14

9

6

4

Radeon 9700 Pro

48

34

23

17

GeForce FX 5800 Pro

51

37

25

18

Okay, so what did you expect ? Interesting to see here is the difference between the Athlon 3000+  and 1800+, performance difference .. NIL.

Guru3D.com Image

Share this content
Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print