the latest mini-led hardware i've taken a look at , all said that mini-led had terrible bleed through and they showed it in the review ... , it was just looking terrible !! white bleed through on a black part of the monitor , i think mini-leds isn't the way to go , you probably can't do much about the bleed trough Because they're so small i first have to see a example of ANY monitor i buy now , anywhere ... , store or online , do your research before you buy something , people !!

With TV's this size, viewing angles should be a concern if they're using VA panels. You'll see gamma shifting at the edges even sitting dead center if you're close enough. 6500 nits is crazy, but I'd much rather have an OLED that does 2k. As long as brightness is within reason, near-black and black performance is far more important if you're in a dark room. 6500 nits would be useful for tiny portions of a small amount of movies. Also, that big one is a Micro-LED just FYI.

6500 nits , will need sunglasses to watch Tv LOL

Nits are like a dick size. The bigger the better. 😀

ttnuagmada:

With TV's this size, viewing angles should be a concern if they're using VA panels. You'll see gamma shifting at the edges even sitting dead center if you're close enough.

true the deal is VA is cheap, has a high yield, and AU Optronics makes a ton of panels. this tv cannot compare to the Samsung mini-led (note Samsung has used both VA and IPS w/ mini-leds) except on price. but there are plenty of folks who won't notice the blooming/screen door/ moiré until its been in the home awhile.

impressive, but one I learned from my TCL TV is avoid roku verison and the have questionable quality , seeing i got tons of lines on 55" after 4 years

WhiteLightning:

6500 nits , will need sunglasses to watch Tv LOL

My OLED peaks around 1500nits, and admittedly after a day's work on the computer, I had to lower TV brightness while watching Denis Villeneuve' Dunes not to look away at some extremely bright high contrast scenes. 6000nits+ is nuts, only thing I can think of is watching something in a fairly bright room. Think I read (maybe someone can comment on that?) that modern HDR movies mastering was done on 1000nits and might move toward 3000nits on the impulsion of Sony, I wonder how many years we're talking about.

XenthorX:

Think I read (maybe someone can comment on that?) that modern HDR movies mastering was done on 1000nits and might move toward 3000nits on the impulsion of Sony, I wonder how many years we're talking about.

nope. some production companies have been using 1K nit monitors, but they are a fraction of the industry. Sony has been flogging the consumer market trope about nit values in the professional space. primarily for their newest (outdoor rated) monitor. which is selling for 4X the competition. this is marketing. as of this year the studios all exclusively use OLED, nearly all are LG. Columbia Pictures (Sony) naturally uses Sony. "Hollywood" is also comprised of many independent production companies that do everything except distribution. OLED reigns supreme across the board HDR Mastering is a very specific process and has unique demands compared to Direction, Cinematography, Film Editing, Art Direction, and Special Effects all of whom rely on monitors. these folks spend the majority of their time in dark rooms (but not darkrooms) and 1-1.5K peak nits is all their eyes can take and only for short periods. this is done typically after the "film" has been edited and usually by the distributor, dependent on the Director's contract that level of brightness might be useful elsewhere (likely on location) but not in HDR Mastering