mikeysg:

Obvious advantage for the RX 6750 XT is that it has 50% more VRAM for newer VRAM intensive games. So, is it faster than the regular 6750 XT?

schmidtbag:

50% more compared to what? The 6700 XT also has 12GB. They're basically the same thing except with slightly different clock speeds.

mikeysg:

I'd meant 50% more than those with just 8GB, specifically RTX 4060 series....made a boo-boo with my previous post.

cucaulay malkin:

this thing is barely good enough for 1440p/60 anymore. if you wanna buy last gen, start at 6800/xt.

schmidtbag:

The 6800 non-XT seems to be the best of the bunch. It's 4K-capable (at least without DXR), it has the best performance-per-watt, and I think (maybe I'm mistaken) it yields the best performance-per-cost. Despite all that though... still too expensive for me to justify for a 2-year-old GPU with sub-par RT performance.

cucaulay malkin:

rt pefromance for rdna2 really got a lot better, 6800 is almost at 3070 level.

schmidtbag:

Indeed it has. And from what I recall, it's even better on Linux (which is all I use). Hopefully the 7700s and 7800s will encourage prices to drop further.