Ryzen 9 7950X CPU-Z Bench MT Score 8% Behind i9-13900K and 34% above i9-12900K

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Ryzen 9 7950X CPU-Z Bench MT Score 8% Behind i9-13900K and 34% above i9-12900K on our message forum
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
hmmmm... I'm looking forward to upgrading my 5900x to a 7900x... But this time I'll try to be patient and wait for reliable reviews like Guru3D and GamerNexus before investing... I'll need to change the motherboard and add RAM DDR5, so the investment is getting much higher than my last upgrade (3900x to 5900x, same motherboard and RAM). When does the review embargo end?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
Makes sense to me - even though both the 13900K and 7950X have 32 threads, an E core is more valuable than an SMT thread.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90667.jpg
All that matter is real world test, though i think intel will win MT this round.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
schmidtbag:

Makes sense to me - even though both the 12900K and 7950X have 32 threads, a P core is more valuable than an SMT thread.
12900k has 24 maybe e-cores got a frequency improvement I think that,alongside cache size improvement,will make them more useful than last gen e-cores,which weren't that bad really
Intel Core i9-12900K z pamięciami DDR5 Patriot Viper Venom PurePC.pl.png
same testing place on 5900x
upload_2022-8-29_20-59-18.png
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/281/281256.jpg
user1:

impressive though it appears to be running under a chiller.
Was that a tongue in cheek thing or am i missing something on the Screen shot?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

12900k has 24 maybe e-cores got a frequency improvement I think that,alongside cache size improvement,will make them more useful than last gen e-cores,which weren't that bad really
Whoops I had a typo in my comment - I was talking about the 13900K (already edited it). But yeah, I'm sure the E-cores are being bumped a bit. EDIT: Wow, 2 typos... I meant to say an E-core is better than an SMT logical thread. Clearly, I didn't get enough sleep last night.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/165/165018.jpg
this is why they should have lead with the X3D chips
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Kool64:

this is why they should have lead with the X3D chips
let them milk the overhyped fanbase first, then give the rest the real deal.im not upgrading now anyway,unless I can literally trade the 10700f for 13500.
data/avatar/default/avatar31.webp
suty455:

Was that a tongue in cheek thing or am i missing something on the Screen shot?
The minimum temp on the CPU is 6 C
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/266/266726.jpg
suty455:

Was that a tongue in cheek thing or am i missing something on the Screen shot?
the idle temp on the cpu cores in the pic is 8C, not exactly ambient, Unless you live in the arctic I suppose.:D
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/225/225084.jpg
Zen 4 with X3D might be an upgrade i'd be interested in. 7700 and 7900 won't be worth it too me.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/278/278874.jpg
tty8k:

Problem is AMD can't rely on a few enthusiasts and mostly 1080p gamers who are willing to buy the 7800X3D at, say $500-550. Main bread and butter is the low-mid products. Their motto for the presentation is also a bit shy "advance PC", not very confident. And while nvidia is promoting 4k gaming and even 8k demos, also we get to see the first movie series in 8k (Lord of the rings), cpu producers are still beating the old crap at 1080p. lol
_________________________________________ "Together we advance" is not for the Zen 4 launch, it is replacing the "old" AMD marketing brand (like you could see "Smarter choice" or "Where games begin" (for GPU) below the AMD logo before). "Together we advance_" is just their new "marketing brand", they only added "pcs" for the event. Also you won't see the tv series in 8k for ring of powers because i think the show is in 4K and only the trailer is in 8k. And you may (if you're a Samsung customer with 8K TV) have access to some "behind the scene" in 8K, but not the whole show. At least that's what i understood. And Samsung being there to promote their TVs, and Amazon not claiming anything openly on the 8K side, i am clearly leaning to Samsung marketing the 8K to promote their TV brand.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
oh noes not the cpuz e-pin score ! How can anyone live loosing on cpuz score ? :P
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/281/281256.jpg
user1:

the idle temp on the cpu cores in the pic is 8C, not exactly ambient, Unless you live in the arctic I suppose.:D
Ahh the old Intel tricks again, this company has no shame at all
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
Kool64:

this is why they should have lead with the X3D chips
Yeah, I'll wait for those for sure. Enough time for the new mobos and their bioses to mature too until then. Had enough early adopter experiences with other platforms...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/271/271684.jpg
tty8k:

Problem is AMD can't rely on a few enthusiasts and mostly 1080p gamers who are willing to buy the 7800X3D at, say $500-550. Main bread and butter is the low-mid products. Their motto for the presentation is also a bit shy "advance PC", not very confident. And while nvidia is promoting 4k gaming and even 8k demos, also we get to see the first movie series in 8k (Lord of the rings), cpu producers are still beating the old crap at 1080p. lol
There is really no point in trying to compare CPU gaming performance at 4K or higher, GPU is always going to be the bottleneck there (unless you use a REALLY low-end CPU or weird graphics settings). In every CPU comparison, the performance starts to even out at 2K and is usually within margin of error at 4K. Also, most gamers still game on 1080p (around 67% per last Steam survey), so 1080p data is definitely still relevant.