Ryzen 7 2700X Proc Spotted - 300 MHz extra on Clocks Frequencies

usoldier

2018-03-02 13:13

Ill be upgrading my 1700X to this one or the new 2800X i realy need a bit more core speed , iam currently running my cpu @ 3975mhz if these manage to get all cores at 4400 it will truly be a beast for gaming and probably on par with the 8700k for gaming .

#5524704

AlmondMan

2018-03-02 13:14

That's looking great if true. Will certainly be looking out for a 2600... that'll be sweet value.

#5524712

buhehe

2018-03-02 13:42

usoldier:

Ill be upgrading my 1700X to this one or the new 2800X i realy need a bit more core speed , iam currently running my cpu @ 3975mhz if these manage to get all cores at 4400 it will truly be a beast for gaming and probably on par with the 8700k for gaming .

yea, that +5/10% performance will make it a "beast". Right.

#5524724

Denial

2018-03-02 13:56

Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.

#5524727

Embra

2018-03-02 14:03

Zen+ is more of a fine tuning for Zen2 I think. I will be interested most in seeing the efficiency numbers compared to Zen. I will be waiting for Zen 2 regardless, if not Zen3. I am pretty happy right now.

#5524730

AsiJu

2018-03-02 14:07

Looks good! The previous leak (forgot about which processor / from where) also hinted at some IPC improvement even if you factor out clockspeed. Combined looks solid. Maybe not warranting an immediate upgrade if you already have 1000 series CPU but promising nonetheless. Though I might get one anyway, just to: - support AMD / Ryzen in general - support a company that retains CPU socket / chipset compatibility over generations - support a company that uses reasonable pricing EDIT: - support a company that uses soldered heatspreaders in entire product lineup (Ryzen, Epyc, Threadripper)

#5524731

Silva

2018-03-02 14:08

I said it would be 400mhz increase max, I wasn't far. As for performance, the IPC improved slightly and the clocks too, so we should see the expected improvement from a refinement. Hopefully this time AMD can manage a launch without memory issues.

#5524733

AsiJu

2018-03-02 14:10

Oh yeah that's a good question. Especially as faster supported memory could push the performance a notch further still. Though given Ryzen is pretty stable with memory support up to 3466 speed atm, I don't see why this would become an issue.

#5524747

Crow2000

2018-03-02 14:44

https://pics.computerbase.de/8/1/9/9/7/2-1080.830233650.jpg 2700X @ 4.2Ghz (It's XFR or Turbo?) 2800X @ 4.3-4 ?? Looks great. 😀

#5524750

k3vst3r

2018-03-02 15:05

Denial:

Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.

Probably saving higher frequencies for 2800X.

#5524753

wavetrex

2018-03-02 15:13

Can't wait for those 8 cores @ 4300 or more ! (Wanted Threadripper but I feel like I won't be able to use it properly... so scaling down) My current Intel cpu (Broadwell-E 6800K) is only stable at 4.1 without going overboard with voltage and heat, and even so it was somewhat disappointing (not much better than the Ivy Bridge before it). Perhaps 2018 is the real year of the upgrade !

#5524759

Aura89

2018-03-02 15:22

Denial:

Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.

If it were the 2800x, i'd agree with your statement (specifically about doubting the increase in headroom of OCing), but since it's the 2700x, i'm not sure how your statement makes sense. If the "increase" is the same across the bored, then boost will be somewhere around 4.4-4.5Ghz on the 2800x (depending on the max boost here if its talking about XFR or not) And if it's the same increase across the board, that'd mean the 2800x would be: 2800x 8c16t 3.9Ghz/4.4-4.5Ghz Boost And it wouldn't surprise me if they simple decided to go with 4Ghz as the base. If the OC headroom becomes 4.4-4.6Ghz as the "easy" mark vs the 4.1Ghz that it is currently, that's a 7-12% increase in OC capability, and from such minor changes from Zen to Zen+, since this isn't Zen2, i'm not sure what (if these numbers are true) is disappointing. But ofcourse, again, if these numbers hold true.

#5524760

Denial

2018-03-02 15:24

I honestly completely forgot the 1800x exists.. I've recommend the 1700x so much. My bad.. lol

#5524763

icedman

2018-03-02 15:34

AsiJu:

Oh yeah that's a good question. Especially as faster supported memory could push the performance a notch further still. Though given Ryzen is pretty stable with memory support up to 3466 speed atm, I don't see why this would become an issue.

Memory support is hit or miss unless u buy specific kits that in my experience have a hefty premium over the others. Maybe this is just me but I had 3200mhz stable and after about a month of running computer became unstable for what seemed like no reason and I noticed it was doing the repetitive boots as if memory was unstable so now it only runs at 3066mhz.

#5524765

Aura89

2018-03-02 15:37

Denial:

I honestly completely forgot the 1800x exists.. I've recommend the 1700x so much. My bad.. lol

lol nice

#5524769

Fox2232

2018-03-02 15:46

Denial:

Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.

4.1GHz Turbo on 2700X is great. Because there is likely to be 2800 and 2800X and that requires clock uplift. And 2700X may reach similar clock as 2800X. And since this IS Zen+, Fixes are in place, improved IMC and CCX latency, ... Clock by 8% up, memory performance 4% up, architecture fixes/tweaks 4% up => ~17% up from 1700x Edit: I see Ninjas.

#5524777

OmegaX

2018-03-02 16:11

Does that mean the 2800x could potentially have a turbo of 4.4ghz? Sounds pretty great to me.

#5524822

waltc3

2018-03-02 17:50

Denial:

Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.

Unsubstantiated rumor is often either grossly exaggerated or else underwhelming...;) Wouldn't worry too much about any of it until you see actual official announcements.

#5524843

Koniakki

2018-03-02 18:42

waltc3:

Unsubstantiated rumor is often either grossly exaggerated or else underwhelming...;) Wouldn't worry too much about any of it until you see actual official announcements.

......or even better, a G3D official preview/review! 😀

#5524871

AsiJu

2018-03-02 20:49

icedman:

Memory support is hit or miss unless u buy specific kits that in my experience have a hefty premium over the others. Maybe this is just me but I had 3200mhz stable and after about a month of running computer became unstable for what seemed like no reason and I noticed it was doing the repetitive boots as if memory was unstable so now it only runs at 3066mhz.

Too bad. I've been able to run my 3000 MHz G.Skill (Samsung B-die) kit with R5 1600 at rated speed since I built the system, no problems. Btw that wasn't any "AMD specific" kit like FlareX, normal TridentZ kit.