Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10
Click here to post a comment for Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 on our message forum
Evildead666
It looks a lot like MS has optimized heavily in Edge and their own software to get this off the ground.
Photoshop though, that is terrible.
Wasn't Adobe Creative Suite one of the Poster childs of this Windows on ARM project ?
Way too expensive for what it is.
rl66
so/so
On other hand it is not where ARM architecture shine...
And where it shine there is already plenty of OSes that already can communicate with Windows if you need it.
mbk1969
But to my understanding ARM processor can`t execute x86 code. So the phrase "Snapdragon 835 isn't performing well good with x86 programs" puzzles me.
Turanis
Plus,Snapdragon is not made it for PC apps.On mobiles he's good SoC.
vbetts
Moderator
Snapdragon is made to be low powered, which correct me if I'm wrong but it does great at that compared to the Celeron?
One thing that I find impressive, is whatever Microsoft has made to run x86 apps on ARM it shows pretty decent results, and apps are actually more than usable! I would love to see this done on say Tegra x1? Or heck, even the Snapdragon 945.
On another note, the Snapdragon 835 can play Rocket League! I mean, not the greatest settings but it can play it!
schmidtbag
warlord
It should be the newer 845 snapdragon inside to be more competitive. 🙂
vbetts
Moderator
craycray
schmidtbag
Evildead666
vbetts
Moderator
Evildead666
vbetts
Moderator
Evildead666
I would bet that somehow Edge will be the only browser 'optimized' for WinARM, but then again, i'm jaded like that 😉
I really don't see this taking off, Atom chips were supposed to be low power, and actually work really well when configured properly.
(Sort of off topic below):
I just recouped a Acer Aspire E11, dual core atom with N2840. Changed the 2GB of Kingston RAM for 8GB of RAM, and replaced the something-rpm 500GB HDD with a 120GB mSATA SSD (in a 2.5" adaptor) and I am so surprised at how responsive and fast it is.
It seems better than my old Athlon x2 laptop with SSD and 4/8GB RAM.
Will have to run some tests on it to compare it and the WinARM stuff, like PC Mark 8 and such.... I have Win10 installed via USB key, and btw, it still activates for free. No need for a licence.
I did a fresh install of Win10, as it wouldn't let me upgrade. Kept the partition layout though, so the key might be hidden in one of the OEM partitions, but I doubt it.
coth
It's a matter of time and matter of will of ARM manufacturers. At the moment platform is not even released and din't gain even zero popularity. If ARM manufacturers will make more ARM processors, especially desktop and laptop-class processors, then it could gain some popularity. Then Google will thinks of making ARM version for Windows. For smaller devs it's not a big problem, as Visual Studio has ARM Win32 compilator since few years. Sure with popularity qt, delphi, free pascal etc will get support for ARM-Win32 compilation as well. For now it's just JIT x86-to-ARM translator.
Evildead666
I would have just thought that google, of all the companies out there, would have the resources and the time, to have a working version for WinARM....
Just seemed a bit fishy to me....
craycray
Evildead666
craycray