Philips 27-inch 4K OLED Gaming Monitor DisplayHDR TrueBlack 400 (27E1N8900/27)
Click here to post a comment for Philips 27-inch 4K OLED Gaming Monitor DisplayHDR TrueBlack 400 (27E1N8900/27) on our message forum
vestibule
Not bad, but what was Philips thinking with a 60hz refresh rate and HDR 400. Thats OLED Limp Dick.
TheDeeGee
TheDeeGee
I like it, just wish it wasn't 4K but 1440p.
pedropaulo
Same, no interest in 4k
Hope as the year goes by , more 2k oled monitors , with decent price will show up
kakiharaFRS
I repeat this probably but I was given, for free a 27" 4K monitor (ips)
by default in windows 7 (probably has improved since) the task bar was 4mm high text completely unreadable and I had to set size to 150% to even use the computer which broke most control panels like nvidia
sure I couldn't see pixels but it was not useable and didn't look better if anything it looked blurrier than 1440p at the same size
I gave it back and asked him why he gave it to me...same thing, useless and no point in 4k at this size also it was a matte screen which goes very poorly with too high density of pixels might be why I found it somehow blurry
p.s. the 1st review of the still not available lg oled 27" 240Hz is pretty bad (another hdr obsessed guy like Linus) especially on the text side which seem to bleed colors so on very small text it can only be worst
Vuckoland
This is office monitor with only 60hz! Well of the price will be very low its good to OLED panel in office
GarrettL
I would think a 32" is better suited for 4k.
But the gpu's needed to run that resolution are as/or more expensive as the monitor itself. I wish I had that budget. Waiting for mainstream 4k in several years. Just went 1440p a few years ago and love it for gaming.
I'm patient. Old but patient.
Neo Cyrus
mgilbert
60 Hz gaming is fine for the vast majority of casual gamers, and truth be told, few gamers can actually tell the difference between 120 Hz and 60 Hz in blind A/B tests. With that said, this is being marketed by Philips as a productivity/professional monitor - not a gaming monitor. It doesn't even have VRR. But, it's only $1,100! Take my money!
For those of you wondering why 4k for productivity, it's simple - sharper, clearer, easier to read text. I run a 28" IPS 4k 60 Hz monitor for productivity and it is ideal. I used a 1440p 144 Hz gaming monitor for productivity before I bought my current monitor and I'll never go back. Yes, I use 150% scaling. That makes everything just the right size, but does not affect the sharpness of text, etc. I'd love to have a 2880p monitor at 200% scaling. That would rival the sharpness of a good cell phone.
Neo Cyrus
Aura89
The Goose
Neo Cyrus
tsunami231
hmm close to what i "would" like to get wonder what price is
tsunami231
well according to B&H it $1099.
The wait continues
Neo Cyrus
Alienware DWF, which is also 10% off right now with the code it gives making it $990. So unless you need every last drop of colour accuracy, or the triangle RGB subpixel layout is a deal breaker for you (doesn't bother me), you might as well get the DWF especially considering it has Dell's advanced exchange warranty (includes burn-in).
Well if it's actually $1.1K that puts it at the same price as the tsunami231
@Neo Cyrus
No go it curved and to big for my desk. for that price i rather go the LG C2 42 and get rid of both my monitor and tv for one, but i dont really want want get rid of my monitor even if i mounted a 42" on the wall it to close for desk sitting.
27" oLED 120hz would be nice but 60hz is fine 1440p perferable 4k but i wont want pay such a price for 27" let alone 1440p the 42" C2 is there better deal Everything Monitor is Overpiced with out being oLED