Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC edition review

Graphics cards 1049 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC edition review on our message forum
#4563432
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90882.jpg
Really nice performance for a budget card. Considering the cost of your average GTX660/7850/7870, this is a bargain.
#4563460
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
Finally a worthy upgrade for my antique card.
#4563496
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
In the previous article about the 7790 I said about the 7850 that screamed more value... Well, based on this new information, I take it back, replace the 7850 with the GTX 650 Ti Boost that screams more value. I would seriously consider this over a 7850. But then again.. There's the 7870 that screams more value for a bit more... 😀
#4563598
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235948.jpg
Interesting though, there is a benchmark video in youtube that shows the 7850 outperforms the 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 3, Crysis 3, and Skyrim (with 18 mods).
#4564431
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
You can ban me if you want, but your 650 ti boost reviews are just not right at all. Same goes for this Bioshock Infinite VGA Graphics Benchmark thing. Different ingame settings, different test setup, maybe? But there is still way too much FPS advantage for 650 ti boost vs 7870 or even 7850! http://tpucdn.com/reviews/Zotac/GeForce_GTX_650_Ti_Boost/images/bf3_1920_1200.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Zotac/GeForce_GTX_650_Ti_Boost/9.html Vs http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=2972 http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/palit_geforce_gtx_650_ti_boost_oc_review,14.html
#4564609
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
↑ ↑ ↑ Care to try "Different Level/Part" of the game tested? Or tested on different drivers etc? Numerous reasons for the difference in FPS and Chart Hierarchy.
#4564732
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
MODERATOR - Content removed. You made your point but are slowly turning this into a weird personal trolling quest - please stop with that.
#4564795
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
You can ban me if you want, but your 650 ti boost reviews are just not right at all. Same goes for this Bioshock Infinite VGA Graphics Benchmark thing. Different ingame settings, different test setup, maybe?
Hey bro, i'll have a look at r7800 with 13.3 b3 next week to see if there is a discrepancy with bf3 based on drivers. The Bioshock results stand as they are though.
#4564837
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/31/31122.jpg
You can ban me if you want, but your 650 ti boost reviews are just not right at all. Same goes for this Bioshock Infinite VGA Graphics Benchmark thing. Different ingame settings, different test setup, maybe? But there is still way too much FPS advantage for 650 ti boost vs 7870 or even 7850!
With absolutely no disrespect to Hilbert or Guru3d, Rillipiru may have a point here. It just doesn't seem correct that the 650 Ti Boost is seeing such an advantage in some of these benches :gape: Then again, the 650 Ti Boost will not overclock as well as a 7850 and has higher thermals. I've yet to see a 7850 that cannot hit 1050mhz core on stock voltage - much higher if you boost the voltage a notch.
#4565186
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Guys -- I have confirmed this and it's a specific driver related anomaly with Battlefield. All Radeon 7800 charts have been redone like 2 months ago for all tests, and it looks like I made a mistake with battlefield 3 resulting in a 5 to 10% anomaly in lacking performance which is exactly what you guys see missing. I'm working on it now (re-validating the entire R7800) R7900 series seem to be correct though but rechecking anyway. I will update the numbers today and reflect them in the recent reviews. Update : charts have been revised. This unfortunately effected the R7850 and R7870 specifically and yes, it did make a substantial difference.
#4565195
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
Guys -- I have confirmed this and it's a specific driver related anomaly with Battlefield. All Radeon 7800 charts have been redone like 2 months ago for all tests, and it looks like I made a mistake with battlefield 3 resulting in a 5 to 10% anomaly in lacking performance which is exactly what you guys see missing. I'm working on it now (re-validating the entire R7800 & R7900 series to be sure) I will update the numbers today and reflect them in the recent reviews.
Ah. Great that you've checked this. Things like that show you're not biased. Everyone can make mistakes. 🙂
#4565216
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
Ah. Great that you've checked this. Things like that show you're not biased. Everyone can make mistakes. 🙂
+1 Also small things like that shows ONCE AGAIN Hilbert is a true professional. Thank you.
#4565286
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/31/31122.jpg
^ Thank you very much Hilbert! It definitely seemed like something was a bit off there and you nailed it.
#4570447
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
Any plans on an SLI review of 650 Ti Boost, Hilbert? I just read the one over at TPU, and if the numbers are to be believed, two of these (on stock) made up around the same performance as stock 680 or 7970 GHz. Probably a good chance to prove whether Nvidia's multi-GPU support is really better than AMD or not using FCAT. =b