Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Ti StormX review

Graphics cards 1049 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Ti StormX review on our message forum
#5642825
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
surprise, surprise. Thanks Hilbert will have some fun reading those.
#5642832
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
popcorn, chair and ready for reading 🙂
#5642835
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
Wow performance is ridiculously close to the 1070. at 1440P it's basically margin of error.
#5642836
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
Man, this is the card to look out for. Barely uses power compared to competition and previous gen, performs solid, it's nice looking!
#5642839
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Around 1070 performance and little slower than 1070ti and V56. Problem is this and i quote HH "The price, however, looks to be 339,- in Euros".
#5642840
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/154/154983.jpg
Power consumption is better than I expected, and the prices are within my expectations, ordered the MSI Armor version for 320€ (though the cheapest one, Ventus, is 305€ here).
#5642845
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259067.jpg
Yeah,if you like playing old games its...worth Gtx 1070 8GB. If you like new games like Metro Exodus and the future Cyberpunk,Dying Light 2 then get Rtx 2060 in that price. 😀
#5642850
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
Hi @Hilbert Please check the Palit review again, title and text contains several times the wording "RTX 1660" instead of GTX, I assume those are typos? Thanks for the reviews!
#5642851
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
Ouch! For a moment I believed it. "These cards all perform at a GeForce GTX 2070 performance level" Huge typo there 🙁
#5642854
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
FuriousAngel:

Ouch! For a moment I believed it. "These cards all perform at a GeForce GTX 2070 performance level" Huge typo there 🙁
Thanks fixed. Also, the number of times I had written RTX instead of GTX in the articles is amazing.
#5642856
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
This is a good card. Probably great for notebooks too. Small, portable gaming boxes will love it.
#5642859
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

Thanks fixed. Also, the number of times I had written RTX instead of GTX in the articles is amazing.
The proof that nvidia naming scheme is a mess. 😀
#5642862
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
Bye bye gtx 1060,rx480,570,580,590. Great card for 1080p. And as always excellent review.
#5642864
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Undying:

he proof that nvidia naming scheme is a mess.
That or my brain needs some AI Tensor cores 😀
#5642866
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
GRGSHS:

bye bye gtx 1060,rx480,570,580,590.
Not the same price segment. Not even close. Only one around is RX-590 which was meaningless to begin with due to being too expensive in comparison to RX-580 and not performing reasonably better. Try to post it once nV releases 1650(Ti). That time it may work.
#5642869
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
GRGSHS:

Bye bye gtx 1060,rx480,570,580,590. Great card for 1080p. And as always excellent review.
580 8gb is 190Eur 590 8gb is 250Eur 1660 6gb is 320Eur
#5642873
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
That Strix is the godlike gpu of lower-mid range. Fast, cool and silent with an interesting consumption. I can't find anything wrong here except a 'lil overpricing. It is equal or better than 1070 and Vega56, in the meantime has all the perks mentioned above. RX 590 seems a very bad option now. Almost 100w more power and much less performance. If Nvidia controls the pricing better, they've won easily all the gaming categories at the moment.

Next Page