NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 4060 announced - Pricing, Specifications, and Performance

Published by

Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 4060 announced - Pricing, Specifications, and Performance on our message forum
#6133220
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282392.jpg
pegasus1:

Midrange upgraders be like.........
20230518_152025.jpg
All these amazing new pc games we're getting nowadays, it's the golden years of pc gaming for sure and we can't even play them. Whatever they are.
#6133237
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
so 288gb/s with and effective 576gb/s bandwidth? need to see reviews. seem to be nice gains on 3060/ti but it supposedly supposed to be 3070 level it is shame most graphs from nvidia are all test with DLSS and RT ON, are the afraid to show graphics with out that stuff? 🙄
#6133248
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/271/271560.jpg
tsunami231:

it is shame most graphs from nvidia are all test with DLSS and RT ON, are the afraid to show graphics with out that stuff?
yes i'm not going to pile on as all the best bits have already been said. i would love to see sales results 6 months out... i'm not looking to AMD as a savior, just give us enough vram to last us at least three years of gaming
#6133256
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224714.jpg
3070 faster than 2080ti 3060ti faster than 2080 4070 similar performance to 3080 4060ti similar performance to 3070 Upgrade every gen or buy the xx90 card?
#6133258
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
PinguX:

Upgrade every gen AND buy the xx90 card.
Jensen fixed this for you 😀
#6133260
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/166/166706.jpg
PinguX:

3070 faster than 2080ti 3060ti faster than 2080 4070 similar performance to 3080 4060ti similar performance to 3070 Upgrade every gen or buy the xx90 card?
no u cant buy 90s, those plugs are burning anyway plugged all the way [youtube=eFYR1yn7Ivs]
#6133273
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

Don't get tricked by their "effective" 544gb/s bandwith number, this is indeed true but only for 1080p, as its calculated based on L2 cache hits at 1080p. 1440p effective would be probably near 400-450 maybe. Not bad, but its not an improvement over 3060ti at all. Might even be a slight decrease.
L O L More people need to know about this.
#6133277
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
tsunami231:

so 288gb/s with and effective 576gb/s bandwidth? need to see reviews. seem to be nice gains on 3060/ti but it supposedly supposed to be 3070 level it is shame most graphs from nvidia are all test with DLSS and RT ON, are the afraid to show graphics with out that stuff? 🙄
Dont worry others will show the benchmarks without frame generation and upscaling. Btw nvidia own testing show 15% faster than 3060ti while 3070 is 17% faster so it will be around that level. First rumors was it will be fast as 3070ti but i guess its not happening with those specs.
#6133284
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246088.jpg
GREGIX:

Die don't lie It is 4050(ti) branded as 4060(ti). And price increase. Nothing else, nothing more...
Same price as the 2060 and 3060 Ti's isnt it, but way more energy efficient and faster.
#6133285
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Undying:

Dont worry others will show the benchmarks without frame generation and upscaling. Btw nvidia own testing show 15% faster than 3060ti while 3070 is 17% faster so it will be around that level. First rumors was it will be fast as 3070ti but i guess its not happening with those specs.
still worth 100usd over 7600 that's not even 3060ti and draws more power.
#6133293
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

still worth 100usd over 7600 that's not even 3060ti and draws more power.
7600 should be no more than 249$ to make sense. Dont forget there are 6600xt/6650xt for quite a cheap these days. Still good 1080p cards.
#6133294
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Undying:

7600 should be no more than 249$ to make sense. Dont forget there are 6600xt/6650xt for quite a cheap these days. Still good 1080p cards.
don't be surprised to see mid-range rtx40 prices if they go against amd's last gen. do you think amd will continue to make rdna2 forever instead of selling rdna3 ?
#6133297
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

don't be surprised to see mid-range rtx40 prices if they go against amd's last gen. do you think amd will continue to make rdna2 forever instead of selling rdna3 ?
I think rdna2 stock is coming to an end they'll probably announce 7700/7800xt soon, well they have to 40 series family is getting bigger. Rdna2 was so good its still competing with Ada while Ampere was power hungry, vram limited and expensive.
#6133301
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Performance wise i see 6800xt and 6950xt being faster than 4060ti 16gb and 4070 12gb for the same price. You dont see it?
#6133306
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
Undying:

Performance wise i see 6800xt and 6950xt being faster than 4060ti 16gb and 4070 12gb for the same price. You dont see it?
Excuse me??? https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/733/158/2e7.png Please do not come with this non-sense... sense that actually makes sense. Even buying an used 6700xt or just hunt for 6700xt discounted (found the other day one for 300 usd directly sold by amazon, sapphire pulse) makes million time more sense than buying anything in 4000 series, unless as some guruians, decide that "having a work" is an enough condition to spend 1000+ dollars in a hobby; cause hey, if you dont make 6 figures you opinion is invalid PEASANT. Go figure, my friend must be working in nestle or be that kind of lad buying a banana per 10 dollars, cause that's what everybody does right??
#6133311
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
tunejunky:

yes i'm not going to pile on as all the best bits have already been said. i would love to see sales results 6 months out... i'm not looking to AMD as a savior, just give us enough vram to last us at least three years of gaming
I honestly see them sitting like most of 4000 series. and nvidia come out these series say they didnt sell well so lets raise prices next gen to make it up, only reason I "thinking" bout the 4000 series is cause I have 1070ti and i not gona buy last gen. which actual make more sense from price stand point, but not from TDP standpoint to me. 4060 is probably first card i seen in while that is near 150 tdp window i would my card to be, (yes I can undervolt to hit that, I perfer not to have to do that though) but gen to gen gains seem to horrible then gen conisdering the prices
#6133324
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Undying:

Performance wise i see 6800xt and 6950xt being faster than 4060ti 16gb and 4070 12gb for the same price. You dont see it?
don't see 600w spikes ? and 100w more in avg. power, that in reality is 150w since what amd reports is tgp, not power fed to the card by the 8-pins. no dlss too. and in rt they lose by a mile.
Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070 im XXL-.png
guess what, a 3090 competes with rtx4070ti the same way. in fact, it's cheaper. and unlike 6900xt it has vram headroom for 4K and a far superior way to boost fps if you need it.
#6133326
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132158.jpg
it's all depend on what you play or do with your GPU, some friends/clients prefer Nvidia over AMD for many features/stuffs. RT performance, there are more games with DLSS than FSR, streaming quality and performance, what about the new super resolution video?, there are more to add to the list. If you only play Esport or rasterization games yes, AMD can perform equal or better for the money, but money isn't the unique variable into the equation. Frame generation is not marketing, just like RT was at the beginning of the RTX 20 series era, we have a lot of RT games out there. AMD will launch their own version of frame generation so it's more like simple marketing.

Previous Page

Next Page