NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Surfaces in Final Fantasy XV Benchmarks
Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Surfaces in Final Fantasy XV Benchmarks on our message forum
Fox2232
Not bad upgrade for X060 card. But I wonder about price.
ruthan
It looks like 2060=1070 with i hope smaller power footprint, i only wonder about MacOS support, if it would take also very long time as 10xx series support.
fantaskarsef
First thought: "Slower than a 1070? rly?"
Yogi
Why did they bother with the 1080 gddr5x version then?
Maddness
They had to do something as the 590 stomps on the 1060 quite nicely. Now the big question is, what is the price going to be.
Noisiv
1060 stomps on 1060
About 2,000,000 of them in all. The glut is that big that Nvidia is not even shipping them anymore, and has not been doing so for a while.
So forget about GDDR5x 1060. Not happening.
And forget about 2060 for 6 monts at least.
Monchis
My theory of market fixing says this wont launch until navi 12 does. :P
jbscotchman
It's probably real, but I'm waiting for new revisions of the 2000 series.
chispy
Will this video card be called RTX or GTX ? Since it will not support RTX features. GTX 2060 or RTX 2060 😕
pharma
If an RTX 2060, not sure exactly which Turing features will be supported since there are new features besides Ray Tracing it could support.
Undying
It better be fast as 1070 and must have 8gb vram or it will fail. Price is also a concern.
1060 stock is still high so like some above said it probably wont see it anytime soon.
RzrTrek
I'm looking forward to the 1080p benchmarks.
-Tj-
Well my 980ti gets ~3300 @4k so I guess it won't come close anytime soon xD
moo100times
It's a weird one. Will wait to see a real release, also at this resolution a pretty large performance gap between 2070 and 2060. Won't this risk them eating up their own middle market? Still plenty of decent last gen gpu's about to dish out similar performance for reasonable prices now. Will be interesting to watch
warlord
Used 1070/980ti are better options IMHO. Disappointing. That 20 series are a huge fiasco. Performance jump is laughable once again.
pharma
The idea would be to compete with competitor's cards around the $400 range. If it does come all new Turning features except ray-tracing the price could be less.
warlord
300$ is OK for this. Considering how weak is RT feature even for top cards like 2080ti averaging 1080p/90/60fps or 1440p/45/30fps, 2060 would be a disaster. Perhaps x60 does RTX_on with 720p/30/45fps. I would never pay 400$ for this blasphemy.
590 is priced correctly with it's strength. It is closer to furyX than how close is 2060 to 980ti. If we can take seriously FFXV benchmark of-course. Well, we'll see in time. For now it seems far away from its release. There are tons of 10series in the market.
0blivious
I thought they said they weren't releasing an RTX card lower than the xx70.
Using ray tracing as a selling point feels slightly dishonest.
I feel like it's a feature they should have done less touting of, considering it's nowhere near maturity. It will be great in the future, when it works at full speed (or something reasonable). They should have encouraged people to try it, but renaming your entire card series? BS. If drivers make it all better someday, so be it (I doubt it). As it releases, it's just not a feature that is usable without a massive sacrifice in performance everywhere else. So you turn it on to look and go "Wow!" and then it goes back off. Useless.
H83
Why not both??? You can have a simpler and slower GTX2060 and then you can have a faster clocked RTX2060 by an extra 100€ because RTX you know... Problem solved.
Silva
For me the price jump is more of a concern. But ya, jumping the price and the performance being a bit short of that jump isn't ideal.
I've said it and I say it again: Nvidia needs to stop doing monolithic GPUs.
AMD caught Intel with their pants down, can they catch Nvidia using the same technology?
