NVIDIA GeForce Now Game Streaming Service Loses Xbox Game Studios and Warner Brothers
Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA GeForce Now Game Streaming Service Loses Xbox Game Studios and Warner Brothers on our message forum
cryohellinc
Recently I saw a statistic that demonstrated the most popular titles played on GeforceNow, top 10 didn't have any single player title it in. Most popular games were League of Legends / Fortnite / World of Tanks e.t.c.
And there's a lot of people that use this platform only to play those - so an exodus of major (greedy) publishers, doesn't really harm Nvidia. As they represented less than 10% of the constant growing player base.
What personally baffles me, is the greed of publishers. Let's say I purchase a game on steam - why I, as a consumer, can install it and play from any device I have that supports it, but the second I install it on GeforceNow - magically it doesn't count as I already have purchased the product in their eyes. As if they are somehow loosing out on it. Insanity. If buy a product - I own it, regardless of on which device I use it. Greedy silly buggers.
Loobyluggs
I doubt they are going to run out of leather jackets anytime soon
Krteq
So, till date there are 14 studios/publishers which left GeForce Now
Take Two Interactive
Rockstar Games
Bethesda
2K Games
Activision Blizzard
Capcom
EA
Konami
Remedy
Square Enix
Xbox Game Studios
Warner Brothers
Codemasters
Klei Entertainment
Who will be next?
//EDIT: 14
Stormyandcold
Not a problem, just more companies to add to the boycott list.
Mineria
Boycott away, you may end up with nothing to play 😀
TheDeeGee
Noisiv
Undying
Geforce no cant get a break.
TheDeeGee
moo100times
Potential renames:
Geforce was
Geforce not now
Geforce no va (Spanish for not working)
I will await my leather jacket in the mail
Noisiv
Dribble
The way steam/epic work by selling games upfront is very old fashioned. The industry tried free + micro-transactions and we all hate them. Hence we are going to go subscription for games. This way of selling is how pretty well all software as well as tv/movies are sold these days so if anything games are behind the curve.
Hence any big games firm is looking at setting up their own subscription service, and a premium part of that would be for them to provide a remote gaming service like geforce now. I'd expect all the big online games shops like steam/epic to embrace this eventually.
The problem is we end up with lots of different subscriptions and no one can be arsed with that, so I expect we'll end up with one or two big players and a situation like Amazon have for TV where you buy prime and that gets you amazon's core stuff, but you can buy add on's for eurosport, or manga, or whatever.
In that light geforce now feels a bit temporary. That said I wouldn't worry about Nvidia too much - they'll probably still be the ones providing the hardware or perhaps the whole remote gaming service to many of those companies.
ThEcLiT
"When GFN was in beta with non-commercial use all games from every video game company in GFN library were available. Now because of the new Nvidia's commercial business model and subscription plans, it is strictly prohibited by the law and industries have the right to remove their games as long as Nvidia gains profit from them. All fault is on NVIDIA and their bad business model."
If you guys see "Nvidia Geforce NOW License" on some steam games don't be so shocked. "Pay extra to stream our game on GFNow"...
D1stRU3T0R
cryohellinc
illrigger
Yeah, I really don't get it. These companies make games. This product makes people want to buy their games, and it doesn't cost them a penny extra to have their games on it. Why would they want to purposely limit the reach of their sales?
I mean, I get Microsoft Game Studios - this is competing with their upcoming streaming service. But Warner? Or Bethesda? How does that make any sense? Ubisoft seems to be the only company with any brains in this operation, as I am sure that GF Now is helping fuel subs to UPlay Plus.
sykozis
kakiharaFRS
why didn't they just say : you have no right to forbid us from leasing a computer to a customer
if you do then all cloud services are illegal too and must end immediately
end of discussion
sykozis
Glottiz