MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X review

Graphics cards 1049 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X review on our message forum
#5642878
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
warlord:

That Strix is the godlike gpu of lower-mid range. Fast, cool and silent with an interesting consumption. I can't find anything wrong here except a 'lil overpricing. It is equal or better than 1070 and Vega56, in the meantime has all the perks mentioned above. RX 590 seems a very bad option now. Almost 100w more power and much less performance. If Nvidia controls the pricing better, they've won easily all the gaming categories at the moment.
They don't need to. people will get this over the RX 590 and V56 simply because of efficiency and noise.
#5642879
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238369.jpg
Whats the point of this card, and why its call 1660? Like....what????
#5642881
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
Undying:

580 8gb is 190Eur 590 8gb is 250Eur 1660 6gb is 320Eur
There is a lot of difference in the price but I think that the performance at 1080p, which is about + 20%, justifies it? Sure if it was cheaper by 50 dollars but here we have to do with Nvidia 🙂 And I'm sorry for my English
#5642883
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
LocoDiceGR:

Whats the point of this card, and why its call 1660? Like....what????
I'm sorry do you see another card by nvidia that is $279 in this performance? No? Then your question is answered.
#5642885
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
I'm very pleased to see that the GTX 1660 Ti holds up against the Vega 56, while also being half as expensive in my country; it's going to sell like hotcakes.
#5642886
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
So now RTX is only for the 2060 and above which didn't sell so strong explain to me why developer would bother with RTX?
#5642888
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
Turanis:

Yeah,if you like playing old games its...worth Gtx 1070 8GB. If you like new games like Metro Exodus and the future Cyberpunk,Dying Light 2 then get Rtx 2060 in that price. 😀
but the problem still remains and is called 6gb
#5642892
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
GRGSHS:

but the problem still remains and is called 6gb
when did the 1070 needed more than 6GB of VRAM? even the 2060 does just fine with 6GB including 1440P and 4K....
#5642893
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246088.jpg
Undying:

Around 1070 performance and little slower than 1070ti and V56. Problem is this and i quote HH "The price, however, looks to be 339,- in Euros".
They are up for £259 in the UK
#5642898
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
RzrTrek:

I'm very pleased to see that the GTX 1660 Ti holds up against the Vega 56, while also being half as expensive in my country; it's going to sell like hotcakes.
only at 1080p
#5642900
data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp
GRGSHS:

only at 1080p
Do you have a problem with that?
#5642902
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259067.jpg
So Palit/Gainward Rtx 2060 ~340-350 euros(mindfactory). This 1660Ti ~ 300 euros?No way. (With the future of Ray Tracing that Rtx 2060 is better than this Gtx 1660)
#5642906
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
This card will be a vacuum cleaner for the mid-range. It will suck up all sales in its segment. AMD knew it needed to heavily mark down prices of 580, 590 and v56 recently. Performance vs efficiency will be an added sweetener.
#5642907
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
HardwareCaps:

when did the 1070 needed more than 6GB of VRAM? even the 2060 does just fine with 6GB including 1440P and 4K....
at 2k, 4k if you see the graphs the difference from 1070 to 590 is very small in future games there will be a problem
#5642908
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246088.jpg
All £259, not a bad price at all for slightly better than 1070 performance. MSI Ventus Palit Storm x Asus Pheonix Gigabyte PNY Zotac 2060 prices start at £313 then most common at £329.
#5642909
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
pegasus1:

All £259, not a bad price at all for slightly better than 2070 performance. MSI Ventus Palit Storm x Asus Pheonix Gigabyte PNY Zotac
You mean 1070. :P
#5642912
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
GRGSHS:

at 2k, 4k if you see the graphs the difference from 1070 to 590 is very small in future games there will be a problem
It's very small because the load has increased and fps numbers are much smaller. the percent difference is basically the same. and no you don't need more than 6GB for the 1660Ti. that's nonsense this card can't play 4K today so you expect it to play 4K in future games? are you serious?
#5642913
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246088.jpg
Undying:

You mean 1070. 😛
Ha ha ha Edited
#5642916
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
HardwareCaps:

when did the 1070 needed more than 6GB of VRAM? even the 2060 does just fine with 6GB including 1440P and 4K....
No rly... Look around the web. 6GB is becoming an issue. And looking forward - it's certainly not going away. If it wasn't for 6 GB, I'd get one in a heartbeat. 15% slower than GTX 1080 and 120 Watts is beyond sexy. What happens when you undervolt it - RUNS AT 80 WATTS? WOOHOO!!! Yes, I am a sucker for low power and silence: the only thing spinning in my rig as I write this are my NOCTUA CPU Fans @240 RPM.

Previous Page

Next Page