Kaleid:

What point?

This one.

GamerNerves:

Resources do not mean that you can just bring a mass of people to solve any problem and call it a day. If the issue is complex, it doesn't matter that much if there is 100 versus 5 people investigating it, because at least one person needs to fully understand the whole structure of the issue first, since we are talking about code here. Organizing even few people to research the issue at hand effectively is the best solution and in fact the only working one instead of throwing money into the air. Heck the problem could even be that they have too much staff doing the same thing and switching places so nobody knows exactly what is going on, but this is just me thinking, I really don't know. Resources can solve problems quickly, but not nearly everything. EDIT. added some

Kaleid:

They can easily afford to hire hundreds of experts in several areas if needed. They just don't really care that much. They are so competent that they manage to invent new bugs where there haven't been before.

Microsoft has more than 100,000 programmers employed. The problem is that at this point the source code of Windows is so large that they had to modify Git to be able to even work on it. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/microsoft-hosts-the-windows-source-in-a-monstrous-300gb-git-repository/

Sigh.. this is bugging me: MP33 M.2 PCIe SSD using NVMe 1.3 protocol: https://www.teamgroupinc.com/en/upload/product_note_pic/c5b68811632bdcc2e516ca197fe7bf1d.jpg Read and Write should be 1,800 MBP/s. I am getting 800 MBPS both read and write. :\. See my benchmark: https://anonfiles.com/Hd58S20cv7/pix_jpg MSI B350 Tomahawk (AMD). See CPUz ID for more info: https://anonfiles.com/3aG1S508v2/pix2_jpg PCI-e bandwidth chart (for reference): https://anonfiles.com/b4HcSa0bv4/pix3_jpg Thanks. I may have a working theory behind this. Currently, I am using PCI-e adapter for NVM-e until I get some spart parts (screws) for my NVMe on my motherboard. A NVMe slot is a dedicated lane to the CPU unlike PCI-e x8/x16 slots? This might explains why I am only seeing 800 MBP/s.

Update. After doing some research, I found out that my secondary PCIe slot is operating 2.0 x2 bandwidth which is 800 MBP/s because one of 2.0 x4 slot was used (PCIe x1). So I took it off and my speed was at (R): 1,400 MBP/s and (W): 500 MBP/s. I find that very odd because 1) with PCIe x1 in use, it operates both R/W at 800 MBP/s. By making PCIe x1 slot available, write speed seems to be a lot slower, but the read speed doubles. I wondered why. It wouldn't really matter because PCIe slots are on shared lanes anyways. M.2 is on dedicated lane, correct me if I am wrong. I will find out on the 29th once the correct screws for M.2 NVMe board arrives from MSI.