Eastcoasthandle:

In that case if you already have the TV I would agree with you. But if you looking for TV/ Monitor not so much. Ah, this was a thing over 10 years ago, where have you been? This isn't new. You do see the contradiction there right? :D I provided 2 examples that are woven in reality. Also noting the cost of these TV's. One thing you seem to be missing is that these are not Monitors but actual TVs. The selling point is that it offers OLED not gsync. You imply the opposite then claim I'm being selfish because I won't garner that view point. Nah, you are actually defining the very thing you try to point finger to. And as I've said before: -There is no proof that people with Turing cards, on mass, are buying TV's instead of Monitors. -This Gsync TV won't appeal to (next gen) console players do to it's segregation for Nvidia (IMO). -Gsync for these OLED Tvs are cost prohibitive if Gysnc is the focus (which is what some of you are focusing on).

Denial:

This isn't really true - for example this TV supports VRR through VESA on HDM2.1 - Xbox One X has it enabled but it currently does not work on AMD graphics cards.

bjornland:

As far as I know, Gsync has been enabled since the last firmware update. I've been using it for a week now and it works great. the range in 4k is 40-60fps.

FranciscoCL:

Which GPU? I'm holding my TV buy until VRR is a sure thing (currently using a UHD 2014 TV, no HDR). If this thing works with my 1080ti (even with that 40-60 range) is good news for me and maybe I just buy one now.

Eastcoasthandle:

Does LG really believe that console gamers are going to buy their TVs labeld gsync when told it's for nvidia only hardware? Or better yet who, on mass, is buying turing cards to run off their TV's? "This gonna get gud" meme comes to mind.

rm082e:

Gaming PC in the living room is getting more popular. I had this setup for a couple of years and I know several other people who are working this way now. I'm actually considering replacing my desk and monitor in the office with a TV and couch, with a lapboard. Having G-Sync on a TV would be great - especially an OLED.

TurboMan:

erfect timing for my brand new LG C9 i just got !!! This IMO is going to effectively kill Nvidia's BFGD initiative.

Cplifj:

doesn't Nvidia Gsync need extra hardware ? Then when it does not , it is more like AMD freesync. in other words NO BRAND INVOLVED, just the standard vesa adaptive sync technology. Losercompanies running with the BRANDNAME. As if the brandname will make things good, look at apple. It's stupid and childish. aka marketing and it's toddler employees.

MegaFalloutFan:

Nvidia GSYNC Compatible [or whatever the basic GSYNC called that doesn't have the actual GSYNC hardware, there are 3 levels of GSYNC] means that the product was actually Certified, tested in nvidia lab to work according to their parameters, that when you plug it in, install nvidia driver, everything will work, no bugs, no issues and all features that should be there were tested and found to be working. Thats it. Unlike AMD that only started to do with with FreeSync 2 monitors [and not all of them], Free Sync one was up to the monitor manufacturer, some had some features, others only otehr features, some had all features, some had tiny range range, others wider range. Nvidia has a list of Minimal features/parameters that have to work, including the range, it cant be some random 10-15mhz range like with some cheap freesync monitors, this TV has nice 40 to 120 range, i wish it would go at least 20 to 120 so 30hz games can be enjoyed too, but 40 to 120 is great for all PC games, keeping above 40 even with RTX is not an issue

Eastcoasthandle:

Does LG really believe that console gamers are going to buy their TVs labeld gsync when told it's for nvidia only hardware? Or better yet who, on mass, is buying turing cards to run off their TV's?