Intel CPUs are Still Better - Says Intel
Click here to post a comment for Intel CPUs are Still Better - Says Intel on our message forum
Petr V
Nice joke.
Undying
Intel can say anything they want but gap is closing so fast that they should be concerned what happens next.
sverek
Intel having a big brain time.
Vananovion
The gap is 10-15% at best and you pay double for it. Intel should really get its head out of its a** and start actually doing something.
Netherwind
Point is, what does someone do that is pressed against a corner? Lash out in defense. It's natural that they react like this but they should be concerned about what AMD releases next. If the gap is closed as much this time, what will it look like next time?
nizzen
Faster IS faster.
Intel is faster in gaming, and Amd is faster in Cinebench.
Buy what you want 🙂
fantaskarsef
Intel shows 6% better in AAA gaming parcours? Fun thing is, I thought it was more than "just" 6%...
Undying
Intel is relying to much on their flagship 9900k while the rest of the lineup is crap. Only a dumbass would buy 9700/9600k when 3600/3700x are around.
asturur
they highlighted what we knew, difference in performances mostly in the range of 2 to 3%, with peaks up to 6%. That is completely fine on top high end cpu. Is the 250$ cpu that is extremely better on the amd side.
Petr V
Dat is the best what they did this year.
Because 4cores is enough for everyone.
nizzen
Why so toxic?
Peace and love ❤
Kaarme
I still remember an Intel exec telling they have the perfect trust in the brand new Kaby Lake. And then half a year later they release the artificially mobo-incompatible Coffee Lake.
I take everything Intel says with a full packet of iodised salt. But then again, I also won't trust blindly anything AMD says either. Both are primarily interested in the customers' money.
Undying
It was harsh but true. I love you too :P
KissSh0t
All AMD needs to do is put out an article saying AMD cpu's are still better and Intel will be confused.
norton
"intel"
[spoiler]
https://i.imgur.com/UVdL7mS.png
[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
https://i.imgur.com/sEsHhz6.png
[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
https://res.cloudinary.com/teepublic/image/private/s--ay5OSzLU--/t_Preview/b_rgb:191919,c_lpad,f_jpg,h_630,q_90,w_1200/v1543890036/production/designs/3647587_0.jpg[/spoiler]
Angushades
Because his right only a dumbass would buy it.
fantaskarsef
"[...] and may not reflect all publicly available security updates. [...]"
I just realised... I missed that part of the foot note. So... they're not even 6% faster.
alanm
Not everyone games, and in multi-threaded scenarios Intel is in trouble. Secondly, who wants a system riddled with vulnerabilities that requires patches every so often?
D1stRU3T0R
He isn't toxic. He is just right.
Loophole35
9700K at 5.0+Ghz IS faster than 3600/3700x in all gaming scenarios even with the security patches. I'm just not sure the 9700k is worth it over the 3600. 3700x is a different story it gets a bit muddier there as you can justify both and they are relatively even in price.
