Intel Core i9-12900KS just 9% in faster Cinebench R23 Multi-Core compared to 5950X
Click here to post a comment for Intel Core i9-12900KS just 9% in faster Cinebench R23 Multi-Core compared to 5950X on our message forum
Agonist
nizzen
Aura89
schmidtbag
Falkentyne
Venix
@nizzen I get that you get a lot of hardware to play with tweak and push it to the limits witch is awesome!
The way you are presenting things comes out and rubs wrong to people , you call Ryzen 1 bad at gaming , yes the 8xxx series from Intel could squeeze more fps and 9th but that does not mean the Ryzen 1 can not game ....
What you describe about "every game being CPU bound" translates to rainbow six running on 600 instead of 200 fps , sure thing it does mean lower latency but we are talking values of 2-3 milliseconds except if you are 1337 god like mlg player .... Then you can not get advantage of that either . Ultimately you mocking people that play cinebench all day is not wrong the number result has no actual use other some vague comparison. On the other hand playing on 400 fps instead of 200 is also as useless of a resault other than the satisfaction that your tweaking gave you 20 extra fps the practicality of measuring the fps is LITERALLY the same as cinebench !
aufkrawall2
You'd probably drop down to 35fps with 2600X in Watch Dogs Legion at some places. And 250fps in CS:GO? More like 50fps in Danger Zone Sirocco map. The worst cases count much more than useless fairweather benchmarks. Zen 1/+ was just bad for gaming vs. Skylake, and even Zen 2 still required well optimized RAM/IF for some more thread-heavy games. Really can't say nizzen would be wrong...
TLD LARS
Aura89
aufkrawall2
Or you are just too lazy to click the 1st YT video when searching for "watch dogs legion ryzen 2600", it runs like crap:
[youtube=yO_CUiIFaY8]
With RT on, it gets even worse.
8700K with high RAM clock kills it, no matter how much you don't want it to be true.
NCC1701D
Airbud
Krizby
Aura89
aufkrawall2
We really don't need to continue talking when you can't make sense of 80% GPU utilization.
Airbud
Aura89
https://i.imgur.com/CDIwJRO.jpg
No DLSS/Ray tracing, from my PC with 1600, no OC, RTX 3070 and 2933 ram
https://i.imgur.com/8iwdpe2.jpg
DLSS/Ray tracing enabled at exactly the same settings as the video
DLSS/Ray tracing from youtube with 2600 OC'd to 4.0Ghz and 2060
https://i.imgur.com/cJnFK7S.jpg
DLSS/Ray tracing, from my PC with 1600, no OC, RTX 3070 and 2933 ram
https://i.imgur.com/9oaUeep.jpg
Now, especially there, not a huge difference in max, average but big difference in minimum, yet is a lower end processor that isn't OC'd and look at that, the GPU isn't loaded 100%.
Now just so we are clear, i'm not saying ryzen 1000/2000 was the best for gaming, never did i say that. Nor did i say the 8700k was worse off. I very clearly stated that it's not as bad as you guys seem to want to remember it being.
I see posts and posts about the 8700k having performance issues as well, and pictures showing 100% utilization of the CPU in 1440p as well, Watch Dogs Legion is not really a great example
Heck, in each of the pictures i provided from my computer except for the last, the GPU useage wasn't 100%, and yet i did test every single DLSS setting and had ZERO difference in FPS, ray tracing on or not, so i'm pretty certain the CPU is bottlenecking it, and yet, still getting better performance then the youtube video you provided, still getting better performance then your original statement.
And then you threw in there CS:GO and 50FPS on Danger Zone Sirocco, these are on the RTX 3070 and 1600, same as before
https://i.imgur.com/ypQJYme.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/sa69Q6N.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/GIgSGor.jpg
Max CS:GO settings, 1440p. Never once did it get anywhere close to 50fps. Sometimes, rarely, i saw it hit somewhere in the 90s, walked all around, heck i was even running the server.
Again, and again, making this super clear: At no point am i saying the 1000/2000 were amazing gaming CPUs, or that they were better then the competitors, my 5900x with my 3080 and 3200Mhz ram gets near double this performance in CS:GO. How much of that was the increase in ram speed, RTX 3070 vs 3080, and 1600 vs 5900x, who knows lol
All i'm saying is it's not as bad as you and nizzen seem to remember it being, especially compared to the competition of its time.
Just for fun, i did the RTX 3080 and 5900x in watch dogs legion as well, and the results are...interesting. This is compared to the very first two pictures, with no DLSS/Ray tracing, all settings set the same as the youtuber
https://i.imgur.com/8VPy6Xn.png
For one, the max 203 FPS is bogus, that spike..who knows what happened there. But also, 99% GPU load even though much faster CPU.
Only a 10 FPS increase in minimum, but good increase in average, but how much of that is the CPU vs the GPU, etc.
The more and more i look around, see others results, the more and more i realize: Watch dogs legion is probably not a good example to ever give for performance differences between CPUs and GPUs, it's not reliable. Heck even the VRAM useage is different on all of them, even though the settings are the same, 5.41 on the youtube 2600/2060, 4.56 on the 1600/3070, and 5.72 on the 5900x/3080... ????
The difference between what you are saying/relying on and what i am saying/experiencing, is the fact you're relying on some youtube video, whereas i have the actual hardware i'm talking about, so, here we go:
Bare in mind: I do not have a 2600, i have a 1600. As well, i am not overclocking the 1600 in any way. I do not know if the 2600 he has is running 3200mhz memory, though i suspect it would be, i am not.
I did every test exactly the same settings as he did, but i only did no DLSS/ray tracing and the DLSS/ray tracing options
No DLSS/Ray tracing from youtube with 2600 OC'd to 4.0Ghz and 2060
Ivrogne
There are dozens of good games available, why are you guys focusing so much on Watchdogs Legion? I don't understand. It have been brought many times, not just in this thread.
EspHack
I suspect the average KS buyer only needs half a percent uplift to justify his decision
TroubledThoughts
Legion was such a disappointment to me on PC I threw it on my PS5 and there it has stayed, problem solved.